Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: "I've caught a bug" - for Scriptor ( Answered 5 out of 5 stars,   0 Comments )
Question  
Subject: "I've caught a bug" - for Scriptor
Category: Relationships and Society > Cultures
Asked by: archae0pteryx-ga
List Price: $4.09
Posted: 13 Jan 2005 23:44 PST
Expires: 12 Feb 2005 23:44 PST
Question ID: 457058
Is there a German equivalent of this expression that makes reference
to something like an insect, bug, or vermin as a colloquial expression
for sickness?  In English we say "I've caught a bug" when we mean that
we've come down with one of those mysterious but mild short-term
illnesses ranging from a head cold to stomach flu or a "24-hour
virus."

I'm not looking for an assortment of such expressions in German; I
just want to know if there's one that has a word like "bug" in it,
and, if so, what it is literally.

If you've seen my #457043, you'll probably guess why I'm asking.

Thank you,
Archae0pteryx

Request for Question Clarification by scriptor-ga on 14 Jan 2005 05:47 PST
Hello Archae0pteryx!

I hate answering questions with a "No", but in this case the answer
would indeed be negative: I don't know of any German expressions with
insects, relating to minor sicknesses. The closest thing that comes to
my mind is "Dir ist wohl eine Laus über die Leber gelaufen" ['Seems
that a louse/bug ran over your liver'], meaning that someone is
extraordinarily ill-humoured and grouchy.
Well, there might be such expressions in regional dialects (as a North
German, my knowledge of what is spoken in remote Bavarian valleys is
quite limited); or maybe there have been sayings that are not in use
anymore. But as far as I know, modern High German does not have any
expressions of the kind you are looking for.

Maybe Franz Kafka just had a deep aversion for bugs...

Greetings,
Scriptor

Clarification of Question by archae0pteryx-ga on 14 Jan 2005 20:41 PST
Greetings, Scriptor, and thank you for your response.

If there is no such expression, I don't know how you could answer
otherwise.  I asked a yes-and-no question (hoping that if the answer
was yes, you would also give me the expression), and to your knowledge
the answer is no:  there is no such expression.

I have complete confidence in the reliability of your information.  So
all you have to do is post your answer.

I just thought that if such an expression existed, it would be good
for a play on words in something I'm writing.  If it doesn't, no one
will miss it (except me).

Tryx
Answer  
Subject: Re: "I've caught a bug" - for Scriptor
Answered By: scriptor-ga on 15 Jan 2005 04:37 PST
Rated:5 out of 5 stars
 
Thank you, Tryx :-)

All the best for your play - I'm a writer myself, and I know that
writing is hard work...

Greetings,
Scriptor

Request for Answer Clarification by archae0pteryx-ga on 15 Jan 2005 11:54 PST
Thanks, Scriptor.  I'm not actually a dramatist.  I meant "play on
words" in the sense of a pun--something to the effect that Gregor's
obsession with his job was such that he didn't dare call in sick even
if he'd caught a bug.  (I would have worked that line until it came
out better than that, and I could still do it in English, but I'd have
used the German somehow if it existed.)

What you've told me also is that Kafka didn't have--couldn't have
had--such a play on words in his own mind when he chose a bug rather
than, say, a brick, a bunny rabbit, or a glass of milk as the result
of Samsa's transformation.

Writing is indeed hard work.  I labor over the authenticity of
details, such as given names in 14th-century France and titles of
respect in Medieval Flemish, to make everything realistic that is a
candidate for realism.  As for the rest, I invent it.  That's not
easy, either, but it's fun.

Regards,
Tryx

Clarification of Answer by scriptor-ga on 15 Jan 2005 12:05 PST
Oh, I must look pretty stupid now ... I thought you were writing a
theatre play that has something to do with the magic of words or the
like. I simply can't hide that English is not my native language - I
sometimes miss subtle nuances.

By the way, the books and stories I write deal a lot with history and
historic settings, and I think that my concept is quite similar to
yours: If I have to invent something, I try to make it plausible so
the reader can say "Well, it indeed could have been like that".
Writing fiction provides some advantages and liberties that an author
of non-fiction history books will never have...

Greetings,
Scriptor

Request for Answer Clarification by archae0pteryx-ga on 17 Jan 2005 21:05 PST
Not at all, Scriptor, and I'm very sorry if I embarrassed you.  It is
no shame and certainly no stupidity to have less than a native command
of someone else's language.  You do us English-speakers honor by being
so fluent in our tongue.

I will return the favor you have shown me a number of times, in giving
me a careful and exact explanation of a linguistic point, and tell you
where you might have seen the clue that I was using an idiomatic
expression.  I wrote: "...it would be good for a play on words in
something I'm writing."  "In something I'm writing" tells you where I
was thinking of using it.  If you take that phrase into account, you
would not be expecting me to say "a play...in something I'm writing." 
Instead you would see that I was writing something not specified.  So
"a play on words" is something other than the work I'm creating.  It's
what I thought the bug=insect/bug=illness relationship would be good
for.  And the potential parallel there points to wordplay--which
translates directly and literally to Wortspiel.

I'm not surprised that you are a stickler for verisimilitude and
authentic detail.  I want my readers to think not only "It could have
happened like that" but "Maybe it did!"  But I love the freedom to
invent the facts that suit me and change them when they don't.

Tryx

Clarification of Answer by scriptor-ga on 18 Jan 2005 05:28 PST
Aaaah! Thank you, Tryx. It's fantastic that not only our customers
learn something from us, but also vice versa sometimes!

I would really like to provide you a (translated) example of the
stories I write, but unfortunately we are strictly forbidden to do so.
Maybe I find a solution that does not reveal my real-life identity and
thus not violate the Google Answers rules ... I'll put on my Thinking
Cap.

Greetings,
Scriptor

Request for Answer Clarification by archae0pteryx-ga on 19 Jan 2005 22:44 PST
Well...you could join one of those fiction-writers' websites (like
writing.com) and post a story under a pseudonym, and then point me to
it.  But that wouldn't do for something that you had published or
hoped to publish.

I'll bet there's a way, if we're clever enough.  And I'll bet it's
been done before.

Interested,
Tryx
archae0pteryx-ga rated this answer:5 out of 5 stars
Never anything less than the best from you, Scriptor.
Thank you,
Archae0pteryx

Comments  
There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy