![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Which is faster
Category: Computers > Hardware Asked by: just4fun2-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
18 Jan 2005 13:41 PST
Expires: 17 Feb 2005 13:41 PST Question ID: 459455 |
Hi, I am thinking about buying a laptop. The harddrive in the laptop spins at about 4 to 5 thousand rpm. I could upgrade to a 7,200rpm model at Dell, but at BestBuys they do not offer this upgrade. BestBuy does have a better price on the laptop I'm interested in. So the question is: Let's say I were to puchase the BestBuy laptop and an EXTERNAL harddrive that spins at 7,200 rpm that is connect by the USB cable to the laptop -- how fast is this connection compared to a 7,200 rpm INTERNAL harddrive? Thank you. |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Which is faster
From: ldavinci-ga on 18 Jan 2005 14:05 PST |
Hi just4fun2-ga, I do understand that you are interested in a higher disk access speeds from your laptop. Most of the internal harddrives in the laptop are of lesser rpm due to the following: i)reduce vibrations(and increase reliability in a mobile environment) ii)reduce the amount of heat generated/conserve battery power. iii)actually the laptop drives are smaller(2.5") and have greater aerial density,lighter and smaller heads(leads to faster seek times), which partially compensates for the performance loss. When comparing the performance difference, you should also take note of the builtin buffer(cache) between the two drives. A higher rpm drive of the same size and same/more capacity and internal cache, will surely give a better throughput, even if it is externally connected at the cost of the following: i)increased cpu load ii)increased latency at the start of the data transfer So, if you are going to use the external drive only for backup/data transfer you idea should work fine. But booting your operating system/running applications from the external drive may not get you much improvement in performance. If you do plan on running cpu intensive applications with your external drive(eg NLE video editing), I would suggest you to go with firewire through a cardbus interface instead of the usb2.0, due to reduced cpu load/latency. Also if you are going to use your external drive in a continuosly connected manner, I would advise you to get an external enclosure with good fan ventilation/heatsinks, since most of the external enclosures have poor heat dissipation. Hope you find the suggestions helpful in making your decision. Regards ldavinci-ga |
Subject:
Re: Which is faster
From: ldavinci-ga on 18 Jan 2005 14:20 PST |
Hi just4fun2-ga, I forgot to mention about the UDMA interface. The external interface limits your data transfer to about 400Mbps(50MBps/sec). Whereas the internal ATA-100 could do 100MBps(theoretical) burst mode data transfers. You will not get the same performance if you use it externally through the USB2.0/firewire interface. Sustained data rate will be still better with an external drive. Regards ldavinci-ga |
Subject:
Re: Which is faster
From: dnum-ga on 18 Jan 2005 16:03 PST |
One of the greatest things about labtops are handy and portable, but an external drive would make it less fun to carry around. I would go for the good deal with the internal drive. Hard drive speed does not matter that much. Interestingly, a well running computer rarely uses the hard drive. More importantly, you should get at least 512MB of memory, or 1024MB if you want to run lots of programs at the same time. But to answer your question, USB theoretically could be faster, but its not because the internal hard drive gets to use DMA, which is Direct Memory Access. For hard drives, I am more worried about how noisy they are than how fast they are : ). You can look at the speeds of the various busses here: http://www.usb.org/faq/ans2#q1 (bits/sec)/8 = (bytes/sec) |
Subject:
Re: Which is faster
From: james_l_mar-ga on 19 Jan 2005 09:09 PST |
Personally, I doubt that the faster HD would be noticably faster. Just save your money and get something decent. Consider an old computer that you have. Let's say it's a 1GHz. When you bought it, there were 1.3 and 1.5s around. Would it make any difference now if you had a 1Ghz vs a 1.5Ghz? Would having a 1.5Ghz give you less of a reason to get a new computer? Also, if it's possible...try the different hard drives...Dell Kiosk...Fry's...see if you can even tell the diff. |
Subject:
Re: Which is faster
From: warmtobe-ga on 06 Feb 2005 00:04 PST |
Actually .. you couldn't do it .. or it would be difficult I think .. the easy way, the laptop would still have it's operating system on the internal drive .. you could store data remotely .. but it's a lot of hassle to carry around all the extra gear unless you have a lot of data! Also it would drain the battery down a lot too .. seems like it would take away most of the portable part .. at least the easily portable. If the operating system were on the external drive, you couldn't use it unless the external drive was plugged in .. ie .. as a 'laptop', unless someone was sitting next to ya'! (; |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |