International Court of Justice
Given the following outline, please advise on the merits or otherwise
of taking my case to the International Court of Justice and/or similar
International body and the procedure involved please.
I am under serious threat on a number of fronts by government departments.
Unfortunately my diagnosed disability conditions have led to at least
three serious attacks on my life which fortunately were thwarted.
The situation is grave, excruciating and acute and has severely
affected my health, welfare, finances, family and other relationships
and disposition.
Departmental actions against me involve many acts of terrorism,
systemic lying, frequent breaches of legislation, concealment, undue
pressure, numerous threats, conspiracy and attempts to seek payment of
a bribe to ensure a favourable outcome for me.
Now, with some of the complex background dealt with in earlier
questions, I again ask for my question to be answered and for the best
course of action, in particular in the International Court of Justice,
which I understand has handled similar ex-serviceman cases.
How does one go about such an approach given that an Adviser, who
worked for the Attorney General, has advised, and I tend to agree,
that I must leave Australia for my health and safety and re-consider
my position for taking action from overseas.
A synopsis follows:
A major Government Department (Department of Veterans? Affairs) has:
1. Fabricated allegations of fraud and forgery against me
2. Used these unproven bizarre false criminal allegations against me
in court, in tribunals and in rejecting my claims for pension and
compensation
3. Improperly interrogated me on these matters and refused to provide
any information on the gross fabricated criminal allegations before
during or after interrogation improperly under oath using lies and
entrapment
4. Threatened me with long-term imprisonment through its Fraud Squad
during the improper interrogation
5. Kept me under investigation and refused to provide any information
on interrogation required under Privacy Act and FOI Act
6. Refused me access to information on the fabricated criminal
allegations against me and requested under FOI & Privacy Act in
writing some 4,590 times
7. Finally provided part of information known to exist recently and
after more than 2 years, while refusing other information
8. Used these false and unproven allegations to reject my legitimate
compensation and pension claims for accepted and/or diagnosed
disabilities
9. Advised further payment up to another 28 years ($2 to $4 millions)
and then reneged on this advice, twice confirmed when I was in my
Barrister?s Chambers
10. ?Forced? my signature on miniscule settlement offered of $10,000
in one claim, using corrupt false unproven criminal allegations
against me and threatening that if I did not withdraw claim they would
sue to bankrupt me
11. Arranged AAT hearing regarding item 6 (4,590 proper requests for
information on these criminal charges) in my absence and without me
being advised of hearing, or of my application even being
acknowledged. My application being rejected in my absence.
12. Denied me access to more than 11 key departmental decisions
affecting all aspects of the ?forced? settlement.
13. ?Forced? my signature on settlement while some 9 major complaints
were advised in writing by my Local Member & Prime Minister to be
under investigation, but which advice was later found to be false
14. Sought to alter terms of ?forced? settlement, to which I have
refused to agree, but AAT threatens to settle matter without my
agreement to changed terms.
15. Refused to provide reasons requested for decisions involving
matters significantly affecting the case, under Good decision-making
for Government and based on Administrative Law.
16. Similarly AAT, Ombudsman and Privacy Commissioner (wrongly ceased
investigations) refused to provide reasons for other key decisions (to
not investigate serious claims claimed in writing by Prime Minister to
be under investigation).
17. Refused to advise me of action to reject many of my claims and to
?roll? at least 11 others into already ?settled? and/or rejected
claims, these matters being key issues in the ?forced? settlement
matter.
18. Been proven to lie to other department/s about my matters and
matters key to the claim and ?forced? settlement.
19. Improperly used and disclosed fabricated vile criminal allegations
against me despite Privacy Act Principle 7 requiring proof of accuracy
etc to all information used or disclosed AND the department Secretary
and Minister having been directed specifically to this Act to delete
and/or correct information.
20. These matters seem to have arisen as a result of me refusing to
pay a bribe required for guarantee to ensure ?clear passage? for my
claims and me being awarded TPI. This attempt to obtain a bribe
from me has been recorded, with other key information in my several
Statutory Declarations.
21. Refused me access to any and all of my files, despite Ministerial offer.
22. Shown tremendous hostility toward me as a result of my FOI,
Privacy Act written requests, my lodgement of some 9 major complaints
with the Ombudsman and my documenting events by way of Statutory
Declaration. This hostility has resulted in total impasse between
the Department, Ombudsman, Privacy Commissioner the AAT and other
authorities.
23. Rejected my ?Proposed Resolution?, for a dignified resolution on
both sides, for my Compensation, Pension and DFRB (Superannuation)
claims, with my then 8 (eight) and now 9 (nine) major and very serious
CDDA claims now lodged, and as advised by the Attorney General?s
Department with the Ombudsman.
24. Caused the following CDDA complaints to be lodged by me and
despite the Prime Minister?s written advice not one of the claims is
being investigated by the Ombudsman, as advised by the Ombudsman in
writing:
1. bad administration, conspiracy, concealment, serious FOI and
Privacy Act breaches and other matters
2. threats and extreme undue pressure to force signed settlement
despite numerous incomplete material investigations, deliberate
withholding of key evidence and refusal to provide key information on
fabricated criminal allegations being used against me in the case etc
3. bribery, corruption, vendetta (see also Daily Telegraph article 31
May 2004 ? ?Torture of our Heroes?.
4. systemic and proven lying, with self-service correspondence
5. frequent breaches of Commonwealth Legislation designed to protect
and guide Australian citizens
6. bastardisation and severe treatment during many years
7. department?s ?in absentia? trial of me and they finding me guilty
8. committed some 16 acts of terrorism against me
9. continued and most serious systemic lying seriously affecting and
clearly designed to affect my claims, my health and my livelihood and
dignity
10. complaint against Departmental and Ombudsman?s collusion in
replies being prepared for letters to me by the Prime Minister and
Minister.
11. earlier complaints have not been responded to despite numerous requests.
The government Department?s acts and actions are clearly
unconscionable and improper, while breaching Natural Justice, Duty of
Care, discrimination and Human Rights, also Administration and other
Australian Laws, Service Charters, Mission Statements and Codes of
Practice.
I do not see any options remaining for me, other than to seek refuge
overseas, given the Department?s threats and actions against me.
These matters are all well documented and substantiated. The
pressures last year became too great and my doctors threatened
hospitalisation, as occurred in 2002, but was avoided due to the
damage caused by the 2002 hospitalisation.
My earlier questions largely relate to the same matters, but review
and advice clearly indicate refuge is necessary and passage has been
booked for this purpose.
Thank you for your time in reading this and possibly my other earlier
questions which would all indicate significant distress I am sure.
Active attacks on one's life and many other serious threats MUST be
taken seriously and CANNOT be brazenly brushed aside any longer.
JDA |
