|
|
Subject:
Sentence structure
Category: Miscellaneous Asked by: sweetpeaz-ga List Price: $2.50 |
Posted:
23 Jan 2005 13:36 PST
Expires: 22 Feb 2005 13:36 PST Question ID: 462101 |
Regarding sentence structure - A compound sentence. Is this an example of a compound semtence, i.e., -- because of the AND can use WAS rather than WERE. In other words, actually could be two complete sentences. The sentence is: The risks and expectations of the procedure was discussed with the patient and his wife. D hastings sweetpea@sisp.net |
|
Subject:
Re: Sentence structure
Answered By: efn-ga on 23 Jan 2005 16:59 PST Rated: |
Hi sweetpeaz, No, this is not a compound sentence. A compound sentence contains two or more independent clauses, but this sentence contains only one. There is nowhere you can divide this sentence, including at the "and"s, to get two complete clauses. A clause, as you noted, is like a sentence, and clauses in a compound sentence can be connected by coordinating conjunctions like "and." If you divide this sentence at the first "and", one of the parts you get is "The risks." This phrase has no predicate or verb phrase, so it doesn't look like a sentence and is not a clause. Similarly, if you divide the sentence at the second "and," on one side you get "his wife," which also has no verb phrase and so cannot be a clause. As Pinkfreud said, the main verb should be "were" to agree in number with the subject of the sentence, which is the plural phrase "The risks and expectations." Here's an example of a compound sentence where "was" would be correct: "The risks were many, and the procedure was discussed with the patient and his wife." In this sentence, "The risks were many" is a clause and "the procedure was discussed with the patient and his wife" is also a clause. You can see that both have both subjects and verbs and look like independent sentences. In this case, the subject of the second clause is "the procedure," and since that is singular, "was" is the correct form of the verb. I hope this explanation is helpful. If it's too obscure, please ask for a clarification and give me some idea of what is confusing. --efn |
sweetpeaz-ga rated this answer: |
|
Subject:
Re: Sentence structure
From: pinkfreud-ga on 23 Jan 2005 13:38 PST |
Your verb should be "were." |
Subject:
Re: Sentence structure
From: sweetpeaz-ga on 23 Jan 2005 17:59 PST |
Thank you very much for your time and good explanation. "smile" |
Subject:
Re: Sentence structure
From: sweetpeaz-ga on 23 Jan 2005 18:07 PST |
One more, after re-reading my sentence. "The risks of the procedure was discussed with the patient and wife." The expectations of the procedure was discussed with the patient and his wife." This is more what I was getting at, I guess. Two complete stand alone sentences separated by AND. Still no, huh. |
Subject:
Re: Sentence structure
From: xcarlx-ga on 23 Jan 2005 22:59 PST |
You could split it into two sentences like that, but there is probably no benefit. You have two things in the beginning of the sentence (risks and expectations) being introduced to two things at the end of the sentenced (patient and wife). You could also split each of your two new sentences into two sentences to get rid of the remaining "and." It would be correct, but then you would have four sentences in place of the original sentence which was also correct. If the sentence sounds odd, there is probably at least one detail that could be left out. If it is part of a narrative, I would guess that the reader would already know who was in the room when risks and expectations were being discussed. |
Subject:
Re: Sentence structure
From: sweetpeaz-ga on 24 Jan 2005 05:54 PST |
Thank you very much all - now this WAS interesting. Thanks! "grin" |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |