|
|
Subject:
diplomacy, protocol, etiquette
Category: Reference, Education and News Asked by: saikungboy-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
28 Jul 2002 23:02 PDT
Expires: 27 Aug 2002 23:02 PDT Question ID: 46344 |
when did red carpet become synonymous with vip treatment? who started it? why? |
|
Subject:
Re: diplomacy, protocol, etiquette
Answered By: ozguru-ga on 29 Jul 2002 00:42 PDT |
Dear saikungboy, Thank you for this question. It seems that the origin of red carpet goes back a lot further than I had imagined... The Cambridge English dictionary states: "The red carpet is a special official welcome that is given to an important guest, esp. in which a long red floor covering is put down for them to walk on. We'll roll out the red carpet for the Senator. The minister was given the red carpet treatment." http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=red*1+10 _________ Online Etymology Dictionary has a short entry for red carpet, stating that: "...the custom for dignitaries is described as far back as Aeschylus "Agamemnon"). " http://www.geocities.com/etymonline/r2etym.htm _______ A search on Aeschylus reveals that he lived 525-456 BC and that in one play a wife laid out a red carpet as a welcome for a returning king. http://www.methuen.co.uk/aeschylusplays2.html _______ A short comment about the historical use of red and royalty is found at the Institut National de la Langue Française. The use of red carpet has now "trickled down" from royalty to visiting dignitaries, ceremonies involving VIPs such as the Oscars and as you say, the term has become synonomous with VIP treatment in general. http://www.cnrs.fr/cw/en/pres/n391couleng/html/n391coula03.htm _____ I also assume that a carpet would have provided a practical benefit in past centuries when surfaces were more likely to be unsealed. Search strategy: "dictionary of idioms" "red carpet" etymology I hope this is what you were looking for, please select clarification if there is anything else you would like me to investigate. Regards, | |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Subject:
Re: diplomacy, protocol, etiquette
From: iaint-ga on 29 Jul 2002 07:37 PDT |
Reddish colours, and in particular a deep purpley-red colour, were particularly prized in Greek and Roman times for the very simple reason that they were extremely expensive and difficult colours to obtain. Today, with modern dyes and chemical engineering plants we can produce all shades and hues relatively simple and cheaply, but until recently mankind had to rely upon natural sources to provide artificial colouration. The purple cloth worn by Roman Emperors, for example (and by the way the death penalty was imposed for anyone else daring to wear the Imperial colour without permission) was produced from the dried shells of a particular kind of shellfish and then mixed with human blood. It required 10,000 shells to produce a single gram of the dye, hence its rarity and value. http://www.cnrs.fr/cw/en/pres/n391couleng/html/n391coula03.htm As to when the Imperial purple became a European Royal red, I have not been able to completely find out. In England it possibly stemmed from the ascension of the House of Tudor in the late 15th Century; Henry Tudor united (by marriage) the two great warring dynasties of the House of York (symbolised with a white rose) and the House of Lancaster (a red rose), and he was very careful to make his own symbol a rose of both red and white. It's feasible he chose to wear red and white robes for a similar reason. http://www.geocities.com/tudorhist/ Regardless of the origins of Royal Red, within 100 years Henry VIII was frequently pictured wearing red robes, usually trimmed with ermine. http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=henry+viii+red This might answer some of the "why red, not gold" part of your question! Regards iaint-ga |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |