|
|
Subject:
Cell Phone Radiation, some questions
Category: Science > Technology Asked by: happy_cow-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
28 Jan 2005 14:25 PST
Expires: 31 Jan 2005 14:45 PST Question ID: 465030 |
I was wondering, after reading a recent article about cell phone radiation moving up a hands free cord, if there is one way to use a cellphone, that is considrered the safest. Some questions One idea I heard was to use ferrite beads on the hands free cord, but 1) can that stop cell phone radiation which is emitted through the antenna? 2) is bluetooth an alternative, doesnt it create radiation just like a cell phone when transmitting information? 3) is there anyway that using a hands free kit can actually make radiation worse? | |
|
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Cell Phone Radiation, some questions
From: david1977-ga on 28 Jan 2005 21:42 PST |
You can purchase a head set to use with your cell phone that way your head is no where near the phone. Example. http://www.ahernstore.com/mx150.html |
Subject:
Re: Cell Phone Radiation, some questions
From: happy_cow-ga on 28 Jan 2005 22:27 PST |
the whole point of my question is whether that will help or make matters worse. A recent artice posted below, says radiation can travel through or outside the headset wire, so they wouldnt do a lick of good. Does bluetooth create the same radiation as a cell phone? is there any alternative besides just letter writing? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4203077.stm |
Subject:
Re: Cell Phone Radiation, some questions
From: guzzi-ga on 29 Jan 2005 18:39 PST |
Just to clarify -- you do appreciate that ?radiation? is radio waves and not what the layperson perceives as radiation, ie that which emanates from a radioactive substance? I ask this because of you say ... 1) can that stop cell phone radiation which is emitted through the antenna? The ?radiation? is kinda essential. Guess you know this and I?m just reading wrong. Anyway, ferrite beads on leads will do nothing significant and could even slightly increase extraneous radiation. I shan?t go into the intricacies of ferrite characteristics and applications other that they are a vital component in electronics. But virtually all the ?ferrite bead? panaceas depend upon ignorance to extract money from the pocket. Blutooth is lower power, ergo potentially less dangerous, but the jury is still out on hazard versus frequency. Indeed it is possible that some hands-free could ?conduct? local radiation but not to the same extent as having the antenna right next to your head. If you are worried, go with hands-free. Be assured that other things are likely to kill you first :-) Best |
Subject:
Re: Cell Phone Radiation, some questions
From: happy_cow-ga on 29 Jan 2005 21:06 PST |
Thanks for the comment. I do mean the radiation emitted as a result of the cell phone transmitting signals, not the signal its self. So, if a handsfree set can " ?conduct? local radiation" then is it still a safer bet than bluetooth? thanks |
Subject:
Re: Cell Phone Radiation, some questions
From: guzzi-ga on 30 Jan 2005 19:37 PST |
Assuming that the levels of radiation are indeed deleterious, it is likely that cable connected hands-free will radiate less than Bluetooth. Though the transmissions can to a degree ?leak? up the cable, it will not be effectively radiated. Efficient radiation demands matched feeder and antenna system, and it would be improbable for a this to be obtained by accident. This is why the ferrite bead can worsen the situation but there would be no way of predicting. Reading the link you provided only makes me question the expertise of some ?experts?. You can?t just willy nilly slap on ferrites and expect instant benefit -- especially at gigahertz frequencies where most ferrites just don?t work. However Bluetooth radiant power is very low, see links :- http://www.memorysuppliers.com/jafrbtfornon.html http://bluetooth.epox.com/htm/presenter_why_in.htm As stated, this is two orders of magnitude less than mobile phones. Relatively little research has been conducted upon accessory spurious radiation because this is not encompassed in the certification of the transmitters and other equipment. Indeed, there are many instances where type approval is granted for equipment (such as printers) and the standard mains and data cables are not submitted for the test. I confess to having been nominally party to this. Ultimately though, the only way in which you can determine the degree of radiation (at the ear) is to conduct the tests yourself. Combinations of various mobiles and hands-free kits will furnish largely unpredictable results. These tests are not easy or cheap so all I can advise is to select those which manufacturers make authoritative claims for. As you said, write a letter -- but DON?T LICK THE STAMP :-) Best |
Subject:
Re: Cell Phone Radiation, some questions
From: ldavinci-ga on 31 Jan 2005 13:26 PST |
Hi happy_cow-ga, Here are my suggestions to help reduce the effect due to cellphone radiation, while using hands free headsets: i) If you are using the phone while driving, having an external antenna(located in the farthest corner from you) and connecting it to the cellphone antenna jack(most of them have one) could reduce the effects considerably. You could do this easily using a diy kit. ii) If using a wired headset, the ferrite beads could reduce the effects effectively when close to the headsets(basically the ferrite beads introduce a lossy high impedence to the high frequency radio waves, while adding negligible inductance to affect the high current low frequency audio). The ferrite beads are more effective if the distance between the physical wire from its surface is as small as possible, which means using headsets with thinner wires. Also making few turns of headset wire(to form a coil) over the clipon ferrite is more effective than a straight wire passing through the ferrite bead. iii)If you are really paranoid of the radiation picked up by the hanging wire due to close proximity of the phone antenna, you could try using a double shielded cable for the headset wire(this could be done easily with little soldering experience). You could also use this with the ferrite beads for additional. protection, if somehow the rf signal leaks through audio ckt. iv)Also try to use non-metallic headsets where the speaker is well isolated from direct contact with the ears by means of non-coductive foam(not rubber). v)You could also try using fancy quater wave stubs with pure resistive termination over the entire length of the headset(Sorry I could not elaborate in detail).You need to know the operating frequency of your cellphone service for this. Hope you find my suggestions helpful. Regards ldavinci-ga |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |