![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
correlation or regression results?
Category: Reference, Education and News Asked by: bosma-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
05 Feb 2005 06:52 PST
Expires: 07 Mar 2005 06:52 PST Question ID: 469383 |
Hi all, With my dataset I computed relations between my dependent variable and several independent variables with spearman correlations and binary logistic regression. These two methods show different correlations between the variables. On which should one base conclusions, regression or spearman? Thanks |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: correlation or regression results?
From: needsomeinfo-ga on 05 Feb 2005 20:45 PST |
Play around with google and those two terms for more information. There are several good websites that talk about these statistics in depth. The answer depends on your research question. At base remember that a correlation is just the strenght of the relationship between two variable (i.e. the correlation between height and weight is pretty good); however, correlation DOES NOT imply causation. While it examples like height and weight certainly imply that the taller you are may impact your weight, that certainly does not hold true for all correlations. For example, ice cream sales were found to be highly correlated with shark attacks, but I don't think anyone would suggests that sharks track ice cream sales and plan their attacks according. Just because two things correlate doesn't mean that they are really related in any way. A logistic regression is used when you want to predict a dependent variable. In essence, to say that ice cream sales really are related to shark attacks and can predit their occurrance. My guess, since you are using multiple IVs is that you probably need a regression and not a correlation, but without knowing more about your research question, its impossible to say. Good luck!! |
Subject:
Re: correlation or regression results?
From: bosma-ga on 07 Feb 2005 02:09 PST |
Hi! thank you very much for your help. Well, i am doing research on the impact of values on the adoption of an innovation. I got about 100 people to fill in my questionnaire (which consists of a worldwide value survey developed by Shalom Schwartz(which measures the scores on 10 value domains) and the question wether or not the respondent did or did not adopt the innovation plus several demographical questions.)The 10 vales are all ordinal variables and the adoption variable is a nominal one (yes/no). I computed relations for the 10 values and adoption with spearman which showed some correlations which in my view do indicate causality since a "-" is placed before the coeffecient if it is a negative relationship. I also computed binary logistic regression with the adoption variable as the dependent variable. These showed some different correlation between the 10 values and "adoption" than with spearman which confused me. How do yo know when you have the best model with binary logistics? when the predictability of the model is the highest? I hope you can help me a little bit more. if so i will defenitely raise the list price accordingly. Thanks Thijs |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |