![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Choice of Processor
Category: Computers > Hardware Asked by: visualbasic_guru-ga List Price: $20.00 |
Posted:
05 Feb 2005 22:09 PST
Expires: 07 Mar 2005 22:09 PST Question ID: 469750 |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Choice of Processor
From: mipet_computing-ga on 06 Feb 2005 01:00 PST |
Java is processor intensive. So you're going to want to go with the highest horspeower available. Intel really wouldn't be the recommended one for that, I'd say AMD. When it comes to calculations, they blow intel out of the water. I'd go for at least a 3.2 gigahertz, 3.6 most likely. When you're dealing with code as you know, it eats alot of the processing power away. The better the system it is, the quicker it'll be. The time you save a day might not add up to much, fifteen minutes here, half an hour there, but over a month you can save a day or two's time when comparing to a 2.4... and to a celeron, well, maybe a week's. I personally would go with an amd 64 3700. Hard core numerical processing and almost all forms of coding will run like a dream. Much faster. |
Subject:
Re: Choice of Processor
From: mipet_computing-ga on 06 Feb 2005 01:07 PST |
http://www.caselab.okstate.edu/research/benchmark.html just a website to show you some very good benchmarks. |
Subject:
Re: Choice of Processor
From: frde-ga on 06 Feb 2005 06:00 PST |
Two points 1) Do you really want to develop on a laptop ? 2) It is often wiser to develop on slower machines - speed problems become obvious a lot more quickly - just about Ok code on a slow machine is snappy on a fast one (If one is using a compiler then fast machines help a lot However neither Java or .NET are truly compiled, so one is only concerned with the speed of the IDE) |
Subject:
Re: Choice of Processor
From: gumby008-ga on 10 Feb 2005 22:26 PST |
I would definately go with the AMD processor as mentioned above. The Athlon processor uses a type of processing called RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computer) which makes the executions of the programs and equations faster. In lay terms, a Pentium may set instructions to walk forward 4 steps, turn right, take 2 steps, extend arm, grab the handle, turn to the right 180 degrees and pull towards self. An Athlon would say, "Open the door". Much simpler eh? I have a Centrino on a laptop I recently purchased and do minor coding, but not full Java and it works fine, but the Centrion is based for mobility not power, and gives more battery life and stuff that goes with mobility. If you want a super powerful laptop, check out this site, but of course power costs... http://www.go-l.com Good Luck!! |
Subject:
Re: Choice of Processor
From: michaeleconomy-ga on 03 Mar 2005 13:57 PST |
i do a lot of java programming. I use Netbeans 4.0, which is probobly not the most optimized piece of software. Now I haven't touched the insides of my computer much in 2 years, I run an AMD Athalon 1800+, and there is virtually no slowdown when I run the IDE. I also have no problem running MS Dev studio 6.0 (the version prior to .net). Processing power is not going to be your bottleneck, for a fast system you want like 512mb or more of DDR sdram. Centrio, a feature in newer intel chips, is solely for improved wireless signal strength and battery life. It doesn't effect raw processing power. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |