1) Was there was a particular work where Nietzsche made these points
(if so, provide), or if it was scattered over several books or
articles?

2) Fill in the X's...

Thanks,
======

Fredrick Nietzsche made this point more than XXX years ago, In XXXXXX,
he pointed out that human beings are able to process two forms of
knowledge:

Erfahrung: Experience-based knowledge. Those things you know from
having accomplished things, suffered pain, endured difficulties,
overcome obstacles. Erfahrung knowledge is like your instincts and
what people call today your emotional intelligence. On Erfahrung,
Nietzsche said XXXXXX

Wissen: secondary and tertiary knowledge. The kind you get mostly from
reading books, magazines and charts. The kind of knowledge that may
seem very logical but that, ultimately, you must accept on the basis
of how it appeals to you.

Nietzsche put it this way: XXXXX

---

Request for Question Clarification by scriptor-ga on 06 Feb 2005 10:46 PST

Google Answers discourages and may remove questions that are homework
or exam questions.

http://answers.google.com/answers/faq.html#whatquestions

---

Clarification of Question by chazb-ga on 06 Feb 2005 12:01 PST

I am 49 years old. The last time I was in school was 1976. 

It's not homework.

---

Request for Question Clarification by markj-ga on 08 Feb 2005 11:36 PST

chazb --


I believe that it was Immanuel Kant who first made the fundamental
philosophical distinction between empirical, experience-based
knowledge and rational knowledge not based on experience, and he made
it a century or so before Nietzsche's time.  Would filling in your
"X's" for Kant be as useful to you filling them in Nietzsche (assuming
that Nietzsche said something useful on the subject as well)?

markj-ga

---

Clarification of Question by chazb-ga on 09 Feb 2005 05:06 PST

Thanks, but nope, Kant is no good. Has to be Nietzsche (if in fact it was him).

I may have someone else who found stuff on Nietzsche. Will post it when I find it.

I remember something like that in "Human, all too human" (and not in
the "Gay Science" as we could have expected), I'll try to find where
if there is no answer.