SI units are different. Customary are more like a ZOO:
size of fonts is points, fabric in yards, trips in miles, or nautical
miles, or parsecs, or light years ..
mass of jewelery in carats, mass of wheat, of oil .. in other units ..
SI is different, there are 5 (OR 7) BASIC QUANTITIES which have
basic units, other units are derived from the basic ones and
There is ONE unit and ONLY ONE basic unit for EACH QUANTITY
general - intro:
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/introduction.html
specifics:
for distance. be it 1st OR nth, covered on uncovered , it is:
length meter m
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/units.html
So, distance is always measured in decimal multiples of meter,
units such as mm, km or Mm ...
the prefix m k M.. is selected based on size of quantity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_unit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_quantity
If you need further clarification, do a RFC, but please,
include more of what you are wondering about, what the problem is, OK?
Hedgie |
Request for Answer Clarification by
dka-ga
on
14 Feb 2005 00:24 PST
The displacement comes out as a solution of the differential equation
ds/dt = u + a*t
The time steps, dt, are the basic time unit T.
This *differential equation* is the one which gets discretized, into :
Distance covered in nth second, s(n) = s_(n+1) - s_(n) = (u + a*n*T)*T
(The units, m, match here!)
Next, choose T, a small time step, as a time unit, and measure
everything in terms of it ... just like seconds on a watch. Now, what
does T become in these new units ? It is just '1'.
Won't the unit of "distance covered in nth second" be m? Can you
please clarify why it has to be m/s?
|
Clarification of Answer by
hedgie-ga
on
15 Feb 2005 07:24 PST
dka
We have more problems here then just choice of unit.
I will try - but you need to understand for that $2 I can only give
it that much of time amount of time.
So - you may have to have to do some
reading of references I will provide.
First issue is terminology
quantity unit dimension
e.g. time s s (s = second)
time ms s (ms - millisecond)
speed km/s m/s (km = kilometer s second)
distance km or m m
...
...
This is explained in references I gave you in the answer.
You need to click around a bit:
e.g.
The dimension of a physical quantity is the type of unit needed to
express it...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensional_analysis
There are many pages on this, some more simple than the above, e.g.
http://www.chemistrycoach.com/use.htm
In brief: Each equation, all the time, must be dimensionally correct.
Your first equation
dS/dt = u + a*t
is OK. dS/dt is measured in m/s , so is u, and
a = acceleration {in m/ (s*s) } and so a*t is also in m/s
meaning, eq. is dimensionally correct.
Now we solve it:
We choose a small time step. THAT IS NOT A UNIT OF TIME, unit is still
s or ms ... (not important right now)
THIS ".. and measure
everything in terms of it ... just like seconds on a watch. Now, what
does T become in these new units ? It is just '1'. .."
does not make sense. You cannot measure S in units of time ..
t is quantity - time , and unit will be s or ms,
distance m will be in m (or km)
speed, u or dS/dt will be in m/s
always.
Who says that distance S is in m/s ??
Here are few equations of the type you have
http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/phys/Class/1DKin/U1L6c.html
http://www.ngsir.netfirms.com/englishhtm/Kinematics.htm
Here is how you solve it:
http://calculus.sjdccd.cc.ca.us/ODE/7-C-1/7-C-1-h.html
http://math.fullerton.edu/mathews/n2003/Euler'sMethodMod.html
..
Basically, from your basic eq. you get
S = S0 + u * t + .5 * a * t * t
where S is distance - still measured in meters
http://www.mcasco.com/p1consta.html
This explains the numerical solution process
http://www.pma.caltech.edu/~physlab/assignment-4.pdf
Hedgie
|
Clarification of Answer by
hedgie-ga
on
16 Feb 2005 22:39 PST
dka,
I want to add two points, after thinking about your question some more:
1) You may devise a system of unit where small time interval T would
be 'unit of time'
or even a system when time is dimensionless, so the time steps are
just numbers 1, 2, 3 ,,,
However, these new systems of units will are not a SI system.
If in new system time would be dimesionless,
and meter will remain unit of length,
then speed v and acceleration a
will be measured in meters.
2) distance covered in step n is always (in any system of units) Vave * T ,
where Va is average speed in that interval.
That distance will come in meters, not m/s.
if speed v(n) is u + a*n*T at the begining and
v(n+1) is V(n) + a * T at the end of the interval then
Vave= V(n) + .5 * a * T (that .5 is important).
in SI that speed has dimension m/s and T is in s , so distance is in m
in the unusual system, where t is dimensionles, both distance and
speed are in meters
Does that makes sense to you?
Hedgie
|