Google Answers: perfectly matched layer

View Question

Q: perfectly matched layer ( No Answer, 0 Comments )

Question

Subject: perfectly matched layer
Category: Science > Math
Asked by: urial-ga
List Price: $5.00

Posted: 11 Feb 2005 06:17 PST
Expires: 13 Mar 2005 06:17 PST
Question ID: 472859

Why is the unsplit formulation of the PML (perfectly matched layer)
more suitable to time-harmonic problems than time-dependent problems?
From what I understand when dealing with time-dependent problems the
split formulation is more appropriate. Why is that? What needs to be
done to adopt the unsplit formulation for time dependent problems as
well?

Answer

There is no answer at this time.

Comments

There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.

Search Google Answers for

Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy