|
|
Subject:
Is K or Kb the universal abbreviation for kilobyte?
Category: Computers Asked by: thedread-ga List Price: $20.00 |
Posted:
02 Mar 2005 12:56 PST
Expires: 01 Apr 2005 12:56 PST Question ID: 483603 |
Is K or Kb the universal abbreviation for kilobyte? We are launching localized pages providing downloads and need a "definitive" answer as to whether something like: 256Kb will be understandable no matter what language we localize our pages for. |
|
Subject:
Re: Is K or Kb the universal abbreviation for kilobyte?
Answered By: pafalafa-ga on 02 Mar 2005 15:31 PST Rated: |
thedread-ga, I conducted some Google searches that should set your mind at ease. Searching on [ "256Kb cache" ] returned 69,200 results -- the quotes confine the search to the exact phrase. A similar search on [ "256K cache" ] returned a similar number -- 45,200 results. Without the quotes, results were even closer: 256K cache -- 224,000 results 256Kb cache -- 241,000 results As you can see, both K and Kb are widely used as a well-recognized and readily understandable abbreviation. Both abbreviations are used regardless of whether the sites were in English or in another language. Repeating this experiment with other phrases like [ 256K sram ], [ 256k file ] or even 256K on its own -- and then comparing the results by substituting 256Kb -- generally produces the same sort of results. Both terms are widely used, and are used interchangeably in multiple languages. Either choice should be readily recognizable by users of your sites, but I agree with some of the comments you received earlier -- use of Kb is preferable to avoid any potential ambiguity. I trust this information fully answers your question. However, please don't rate this answer until you have everything you need. If you would like any additional information, just post a Request for Clarification to let me know how I can assist you further, and I'm at your service. All the best, pafalafa-ga |
thedread-ga rated this answer: |
|
Subject:
Re: Is K or Kb the universal abbreviation for kilobyte?
From: pinkfreud-ga on 02 Mar 2005 13:55 PST |
There is no single "correct" abbreviation for kilobyte. However, 'Kb' is less subject to misinterpretation. I think it's a better choice than 'K', which can be an abbreviation for other things, such as 'karat' or 'Kelvin'. |
Subject:
Re: Is K or Kb the universal abbreviation for kilobyte?
From: thx1138-ga on 02 Mar 2005 14:00 PST |
My colleague pinkfreud is quite correct, there is no one single correct version but Kb is usually understood (that's what I use) "In computer literature, kilobyte is usually abbreviated as K or Kb. To distinguish between a decimal K (1,000) and a binary K (1,024), the IEEE has suggested following the convention of using a small k for a decimal kilo and a capital K for a binary kilo, but this convention is by no means strictly followed." http://drmwatch.webopedia.com/TERM/K/kilobyte.html "KILOBYTES A kilobyte contains 1,024 bytes of information. 'Kilo' in decimal systems stands for 1,000 but in binary, a kilobyte contains a little more. Because of this, a kilobyte or a 'k' or a 'kb' is frequently referred to as 1,000 bytes. If you want to be really exact in your measurements, I've heard that a capital K is used to indicate a binary kilo (1,024) and a lower case k is used to indicate a traditional kilo (1,000). If on a floppy disk you have 720k of information, then it contains 720,000 bytes or characters." http://www.anu.edu.au/ITA/corecomputer/notes/bytes_cc.html "However, the standard-keepers of the SI dislike the usage of an upper case "B", which stands for bel or "K" which stands for the kelvin, a unit of temperature. In 1998, the IEC decreed to call 1,024 bytes a kibibyte (KiB) ? a term which is only slowly catching on. During the transition period, the IEEE suggests using a lower-case "k" for the decimal kilo (1,000) and, if properly pointed out, an upper-case "K" for the binary kilo (1,024), thereby taking the historical development into account. Unfortunately this is not extended to the higher order prefixes and has never been widely recognized." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilobyte Very best regards THX1138 |
Subject:
Re: Is K or Kb the universal abbreviation for kilobyte?
From: garyking-ga on 02 Mar 2005 16:45 PST |
KB is more widely known. This is because you can easily change it to MB for megabyte, GB for gigabyte, and they all follow a similiar structure (i.e. they contain B at the end, 2 characters, they are capital, etc.) |
Subject:
KB = 1024 bytes; kb = 1000 bits
From: bavi_h-ga on 02 Mar 2005 23:21 PST |
May I suggest you always use a capital B to mean bytes and a lowercase b to mean bits. Although it isn't a hard rule, the lowercase b can mean bits in some contexts. (Most notably, when indicating the data rates of MP3 files and such, kb/s means thousands of bits per second.) The capital KB is usually always understood to mean 1024 bytes. |
Subject:
Re: Is K or Kb the universal abbreviation for kilobyte?
From: mcnoob-ga on 03 Mar 2005 10:12 PST |
In hardware design it's common to use 'b' for bit and 'B' for byte. Networking rates generally use bits per second while storage and processors use bytes. These aren't hard and fast rules but one common usage. |
Subject:
Re: Is K or Kb the universal abbreviation for kilobyte?
From: volterwd-ga on 07 Mar 2005 14:28 PST |
K simply stands for Kilo... you wouldnt say i weigh 230k would you? you would say i weigh 230kg... |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |