![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Law Enforcement Response to Grand Theft Robbery
Category: Relationships and Society > Law Asked by: gmatias-ga List Price: $9.50 |
Posted:
04 Mar 2005 09:53 PST
Expires: 15 Mar 2005 08:12 PST Question ID: 484691 |
I'm writing a graphic novel and have a question about the specific law enforcement response to a robbery. Here is the situation: A piece of proprietary property capable of being a public health hazard if handled incorrectly valued in the tens of thousands of dollars is stolen from a SF-based cryonic research clinic. The police are called in to investigate. They are able to get information on the woman who stole that the item, but are unable to locate her. Although a local, it is obvious that she has fled the state with the item. A warrant would be issued for her arrest (I'm assuming). My question is: what would the law response be to this and who would coordinate it? * Would the SF robbery cops keep tabs on it? * Since the suspect has fled the state, would it be passed along to a Federal agency (FBI or US Marshals)? * If the SF cops do stay involved, would they go after her if she was spotted in, say, Baltimore? |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Law Enforcement Response to Grand Theft Robbery
From: frde-ga on 04 Mar 2005 13:44 PST |
Kill her off and chuck her down a mine shaft However, unknown to her former 'patrons' there is a lateral entrance - let some kids find the corpse, also the weopon - a curious East European piece that excites interest from the spooks Atypical new inhabitants turn up in town, all squeaky clean - but just .. wrong - say five families Oddly they all have a family member with a new job at the clinic - the two from the 'IAC' recognize the other three, but cannot place them - are they the 'opposition', 'friends' or is it 'need to know' You could swap a few wives in the interest of national security - also run a 'cute' sub plot with their kids levelling and not letting on. I would also suggest that they are all after a (well confirmed) rumour that anti Alzheimer drug seems to have unexpected effects on non sufferers, say a 100% IQ boost. Your finale could be having the whole (mutually suspicious, but not sure) lot rounded up and given a forcible 'vaccination' When, after a few graphically described days, the drug 'takes' and thay walk out - with parting words 'Buy a tropical island, no son, we're going to build one' 'We can build an island on junk, and get well paid for it' 'In five years a coconut tree won't know the difference' Hmm I can see a book in this, - shame I'll not remember the embellishments tomorrow I would call it 'Sadie's Brain' (also pay 5% royalties to Stephen King whose formula and 'hang loose' style I've pretty much 'deconstructed' ( <- a word to be removed from the E. Lang.)) |
Subject:
Re: Law Enforcement Response to Grand Theft Robbery
From: drdeftly-ga on 10 Mar 2005 09:44 PST |
I'll offer an answer to your question here. By the way, you describe a BURGLARY here and NOT a robbery. ON good evidence, a warrant could be issued for her arrest. Once stolen property crosses a state line, it is involved in "interstate commerce." As such, the Feds can get involved. Usually, they only get involved in interstate kidnapping cases as local can deal with stolen cars and the like. Because there is a biohazard (and the possibility of terrorism and the like, say a similar situation to biological weapons) --- the Feds would probably get involved. Probably the Center for Disease Control and the Federal Bureau of INvestigation would become involved. Without more in the way of details, it's hard to say what else might happen. Dr. Deftly |
Subject:
Re: Law Enforcement Response to Grand Theft Robbery
From: drdeftly-ga on 10 Mar 2005 09:46 PST |
Oh, also the original jurisdiction is ALWAYS involved in a crime of this type. LOCAL prosecutors are the ones who prosecute ALL crimes in this country. Only rarely does a criminal case go to a FEDERAL judge. Therefore, the local cops would be involved in this one start to finish. Dr. Deftly |
Subject:
Re: Law Enforcement Response to Grand Theft Robbery
From: theother420-ga on 10 Mar 2005 13:03 PST |
First let?s say someone breaks into a building and takes an experimental jug of super X. The lab manager shows up in the morning and finds Super X missing from the shelf. He calls the local police to files the report. Law enforcement shows up and starts the investigation. The investigation would consist of talking to any witness, fingerprinting, photos and what ever would be applicable to the situation. Once they have determined that Mr. / Mrs. Smith is the suspect they will petition the court for an arrest warrant. If the warrant is granted then the information is put in to a system. What is the system.. the system is a unified law enforcement data base. This data base is accessed by all law enforcement agencies. OK now think back to your last law enforcement agency encounter (traffic stop, filing a report, etc..). Remember when the officer asked you for your driver license and or social number? What they are doing is running you threw the system for any warrants, cautions, etc. Ok now let?s say Mr. / Mrs. Smith was stopped on a traffic stop in Missouri. The officer would run the name threw the system. The system shows up as Mr. / Mrs. Smith having a warrant for her arrest. Now what the officer does first is find out if the warrant is extraditable. What this means is will the agency that filled the warrant pick the person up from the local Missouri jail. In most cases they will only extradite in the state that the report was filed in. The biggest reason is the cost of picking the person up out of state. Some states will extradite out of state for big crimes such as murder, major assaults, large drug positions, some burglaries and other serious crimes. Minor burglaries, traffic offenses, simple assaults, minor drug sales and infractions are almost always instate only. Ok now lets say that the warrant is an instate extradition only. The officer will look at this and inform the person of the warrant and let them go on their way. The reason for not arresting on the warrant is that if the agency that filed the warrant refuses to come pick up the subject the officer in Missouri has no legal reason to hold that person. It?s a big mess I know. Know lets say that Mr. / Mrs. Smith has a warrant where the extradition is out of state. Smith will be picked up on the warrant and taken to jail where she will wait for the other agency to come pick her up. In reality the officer that initially investigated the case will file for the warrant and once he does that he will forget about the case until he goes to court on this. The officer isn?t a bad person for this and would like to stay on the same case till the end but please keep in mind that he can take any where from 5 to 10 reports in a single day. If he just deals with your case 8 hours a day then he fails to do his job with the other remaining calls. And as for the FBI or US marshals getting involved?. Well to put it bluntly No they will not. They will only assist if the case is a major case such as a multiple homicide or something so outrages that they have to assist. Once again they are not bad people but they have thousands of cases a day come in that take priority over a simple burglary. As Dr. Deftly said Usually, they only get involved in interstate kidnapping cases as local can deal with stolen cars and the like. Sometimes is seems unfair that it happens like this but that is reality. ?Leave the big words and grammar out of this and just answer the question? |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |