<Online Internet Gambling Website Ownership.
I am not a member of the legal profession so I would strongly suggest
that you consult a lawyer before investing in an offshore gambling
site.
Since internet gambling is a relatively new phenomenon, there have not
been many cases brought in the courts to test the law.
The case against Jay Cohen was for violations of the Wire Act. In
order to not fall foul to this law, it would be necessary to ensure
that no customers of the website were US residents.
However the Wire Act only covers sports betting so it could be argued
that casino betting is not covered. To date this argument has not been
tested in court.
Federal Wire Wager Act.
[58] Subsection (a) of the Wire Act, a criminal provision, provides:
Whoever being engaged in the business of betting or wagering knowingly
uses a wire communication facility for the transmission in interstate
or foreign commerce of bets or wagers or information assisting in the
placing of bets or wagers on any sporting event or contest, or for the
transmission of a wire communication which entitles the recipient to
receive money or credit as a result of bets or wagers, or for
information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers, shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.[59]
http://www.gambling-law-us.com/Federal-Laws/wire-act.htm
This site explains how the law applied in the case of Jay Cohen.
(Source: Phone and Internet Use as Basis for Wire Act Violations. By
Chuck Humphrey.)
http://www.gambling-law-us.com/Articles-Notes/Internet-Wire-Act.htm
Since the case of Jay Cohen, the World Trade Organisation has ruled
that US laws banning cross-border gambling break international trade
rules. On March 27, 2003, Antigua and Barbuda requested formal
consultations with the United States and the World Trade Organisation
concerning the US ban on cross-border gambling and betting services
industry.
On March 24, 2004, the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruled that US
federal law banning Internet gambling violated the US's international
trade obligations. The US government has appealed against this ruling
and a verdict is expected in the spring of 2005.
(Source: The Trade of Cross-Border Gambling and Betting: The WTO
Dispute Between Antigua and the United States.)
http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:tA25TDqCUy0J:www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/PDF/2004DLTR0013.pdf++wto+us+gambling+%22wire+act%22&hl=en
The American Society of International Law looks at the case in detail.
http://www.asil.org/insights/2004/11/insight041117.html
Full transcripts of the complaint can be found here ? see Gambling and
betting, US, cross-border supply (GATS) ? Brought by Antigua and
Barbuda DS285. Click on DS285 for an index to all documents.
http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_subjects_index_e.htm#gambling_betting>
<Search strategy:>
<"jay cohen">
<://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22jay+cohen%22>
<"jay cohen" wto us gambling>
<://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&rls=GGLD%2CGGLD%3A2004-31%2CGGLD%3Aen&q=%22jay+cohen%22+wto+us+gambling>
<Hope this helps.> |