![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Effect of incresed cooling tower water flow rate
Category: Science Asked by: tripplets-ga List Price: $50.00 |
Posted:
18 Mar 2005 01:49 PST
Expires: 21 Mar 2005 22:49 PST Question ID: 496632 |
1. In an evaporative cooling system using a surface conder. If ambient conditions, steam flow and temmperatures are assumed to be constant. Explain how the cooling water flow rate will affect the following: - Cooling tower water outlet temperature. - Cooling tower water inlet temperature. - Condenser vacuum. - Generator output. - Heat rejected by cooling system. 2. In a steam turbine cycle, approximately 60% of the heat input is thrown away in the cooling tower with no useful work from it. This is a waste of energy. Why do designers and users accept it? |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Effect of incresed cooling tower water flow rate
From: myoarin-ga on 21 Mar 2005 09:58 PST |
Hi, to your second question, I cannot tell you why the waste of hit is put up with, but it isn't everywhere. Instead of wasting it in a cooling tower, in Germany, the steam is often passed through a heat converter (right expression?)to heat water piped to heat surrounding buildings. That raises the question: what do they do with the hot water in the summer? I don't know, maybe the heated water just circulates without going through the radiators, and the system is less efficient then. Oh, I guess that doesn't matter as long as the steam condenses; if the condensed water is warmer, less energy is needed to convert it back to steam. The only cooling tower I have seen in the States was so far out in the country, that this solution was not feasible. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |