Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: the Philippines vs. Philippines ( No Answer,   7 Comments )
Question  
Subject: the Philippines vs. Philippines
Category: Reference, Education and News
Asked by: thomaschico-ga
List Price: $5.00
Posted: 21 Mar 2005 07:20 PST
Expires: 04 Apr 2005 12:39 PDT
Question ID: 497974
why do people call the Philippines "the" Philippines and not just Philippines?

Sample usage:
The Spratly Islands consist of more than 100 small islands or reefs.
They are surrounded by rich fishing grounds and potentially by gas and
oil deposits. They are claimed in their entirety by China, Taiwan, and
Vietnam, while portions are claimed by Malaysia and "the" Philippines.
--- cia.gov

Whats with the "the" in the "the Philippines".
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
Subject: Re: the Philippines vs. Philippines
From: myoarin-ga on 21 Mar 2005 07:43 PST
 
It is simply traditional usage.  With island groups quite common, the
Orkneys, the Hebrides, and logical since one is referring to a group,
and, I believe, using an article was earlier common for areas,  "the
Lebanon", maybe from a time when it was not a country but only an area
of the Middle East.  And we still speak of the Netherlands, again a
plural.
This usage may have dropped out of favor in modern, telegraph-like speech.
Subject: Re: the Philippines vs. Philippines
From: pinkfreud-ga on 21 Mar 2005 08:58 PST
 
Some of the information in this answer may be of interest:

http://www.answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=319841
Subject: Re: the Philippines vs. Philippines
From: indexturret-ga on 21 Mar 2005 13:43 PST
 
The name is structurally a plural count-noun. A native English-speaker
can "feel" that it refers to multiple islands. What confuses the issue
is that the same name, without inflection, also gets used when a
non-count sense is "felt." Very similar to "The Netherlands" and "The
United States"; but the latter two names are more often used in a
non-count sense than in their original count-noun sense. If English
employed inflectional differences to keep the count and non-count
senses separate, it would be less confusing. For example, we say
"Indonesia" to refer to "the whole region that is filled with the
[discrete] Indonesian Islands." If we did this for the Philippines, we
would say that "Philippinia" was "the whole region comprising the
[discrete] Philippine Islands." But alas, instead of "Philippinia," we
just use the count-sense structure to stand for the non-count-sense
meaning.
Subject: Re: the Philippines vs. Philippines
From: myoarin-ga on 22 Mar 2005 07:39 PST
 
You learn something every day.  Pinkfreud's reference really settles
the matter, I think, worth the mullah for remembering or finding it.
Reading German, I am still surprised when the UN and USA (in German)
are followed by a verb in the plural form, which is completely
correct.  The English go the other way, sometimes using a plural verb
with a singular noun that is a collective, parliament, for example.
And jack_of_few_trades-ga, who just  - after 12 months -  added a
comment to the qustion Pink referenced, makes an interesting  - but
explainable point:  "going to court" is going to the institution and
presumably being involved in its proceedings.  "Going to the court" is
going to the physical edifice, to the courthouse, as in the answer,
the noun "house" having been dropped.
I don't know about "the 101" in California.  I always say "route 101"
and people look at me funny.  But there is no explaining the way
people talk in Southern California (except my sister.  Have to ask
her.)
Subject: Re: the Philippines vs. Philippines
From: techtor-ga on 22 Mar 2005 09:24 PST
 
I'm a denizen of this country right now, I believe "the Philippines"
is called as such because a more expanded way to call my country would
be "The Philippine Islands" ('Philippine' without the 's' becomes an
adjective). To make it shorter, it's just called "The Philippines."
It's probably done in the same way as you would shorten the "special
units" as "the specials." Or it's used in the same way as The Azores,
The Hebrides. I think even "the United States" is a name that
qualifies being under this rule.
Subject: Re: the Philippines vs. Philippines
From: jack_of_few_trades-ga on 22 Mar 2005 11:41 PST
 
Oh was I 12 months late?  Silly me, thanks for pointing that out
Myoarin... I rarely check the dates, just follow the links blindly :)
Subject: Re: the Philippines vs. Philippines
From: sheryll-ga on 04 Apr 2005 07:15 PDT
 
Maybe it's a shortened version of 'Republic of the Philippines' (?)

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy