View Question
Q: Intro Finance Assignment Due by midnight on march 27th, 2005 ( Answered ,   0 Comments )
 Question
 Subject: Intro Finance Assignment Due by midnight on march 27th, 2005 Category: Business and Money > Finance Asked by: inahurry-ga List Price: \$15.00 Posted: 27 Mar 2005 13:18 PST Expires: 26 Apr 2005 14:18 PDT Question ID: 501107
 ```You recently invented a new board game and have done some market research. Your research indicates that board games generally have a five-year life cycle with annual sales estimated to be: Year 1 2,000 units Year 2 5,000 units Year 3 5,000 units Year 4 4,000 units Year 5 2,000 units The game will sell at a competitive price of \$25 per unit. Variable costs are \$12 per unit and fixed costs are \$8,000 per year. You plan to manufacture the game "in-house" and thus require an initial capital expenditure of \$60,000 and net working capital of \$2,500. The capital equipment has a CCA rate of 20% for tax purposes and a salvage value of \$20,000. Your marginal tax rate is 20%, and your cost of capital is 16%. Required: Calculate the NPV and determine whether it makes sense to invest in the opportunity. Assume the asset pool is closed at the end of the project.```
 ```Inahurry ? This is a relatively straightforward capital budgeting problem ? though one has to be careful with the cash coming out in year 5. I?ve set up a spreadsheet to do the calculations and it?s clearly marked. The spreadsheet is here and will open in any browser. You may wish to save it in Excel because servers are unavailable from time-to-time. That will also enable you to edit it, should you want to do any sensitivity analysis: ?Board Game NPV? (Mar. 27, 2005) http://www.mooneyevents.com/boardgame.xls But there are some things to keep in mind regarding this problem: 1. Using the Year 0 convention is the best way to represent cash investments made up-front. 2. Rather than divide each year?s cash flow by the NPV factor (1.16 in year 1; 1.16 squared in year 2; etc.) I find it easiest to do the calculations by year, then multiply the NPV factor. So year 1 = 1/1.16; year 2 = 1/(1.16)^2; etc. 3. EBITDA is now used commonly by analysts; it stands for Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation & Amortization. It?s convenient to use here as a sub-total AND as a check. Since only taxes come out of it in this problem, that line minus Taxes should be Cash Flow - except for year 5 when we have several recuperations of funds. 4. Year 5: I?ve broken the \$20,000 into 2 pieces ? the \$8,000 that?s already been depreciated. You?ll owe a tax on the gain. And the other \$12,000 that?s really just recouping your initial investment. And the working capital that comes back out too! The NPV of this investment is strongly positive at almost \$56,000. So, it?s a definite ?Go.? Best regards, Omnivorous-GA```
 inahurry-ga rated this answer: ```Great answer as far as I know but I ended up doing another project so I never used this question in my research. Very quick response and was very professional. A+```