Teresa --
Thanks for the kind words, and I am happy that you share my confidence
that we have found the right edition. I will simply repost the "meat"
of my comment as the answer and add a few words about how I found it.
I am not an expert, but I wouldn't be surprised if your copy is worth
a few bucks anyway, since intact but flawed copies (like the one cited
below) of the 1903 edition (as opposed to the 1939 reissue) appear to
be worth several hundred.
As noted, I believe that you have the 1903 Bobbs-Merrill edition of
"The [New] Wizard of Oz." That is the edition with the cover image
that I provided in my clarification request. Here is another image of
the edition, along with a brief description:
E. Wolfs: Past Auctions (scroll to item 327)
http://www.ewolfs.com/past_auctions/may_books/323
Here is a little relevant history:
"The book was first published by George M. Hill as The Wonderful
Wizard of Oz, but soon afterwards, despite the success of their new
book, the publisher went bankrupt. By the time the book was reissued,
the story had become a hit play under the shortened name The Wizard of
Oz. The new publisher, Bobbs-Merrill, originally called the book The
New Wizard of Oz, but the New was quickly dropped from the cover, and
the book became better known simply as The Wizard of Oz. However, it
was officially still titled The New Wizard of Oz, since that was the
title on record at the copyright office, and on the title page until
1956. For some reason, this edition replaced "yellow daisies" and
"yellow flowers" in chapter 14 with "bright daisies" and "scarlet
flowers," but that is the only change in the text. The earliest
editions also gave chapter 13 two different titles, "How the Four Were
Reunited" on the contents page and "The Rescue" in the text itself.
Later editions cleared this up by resetting the table of contents to
read "The Rescue" for chapter 13."
Eskimo.com: Wonderful Wizard of OZ: FAQ (Question 2.7)
http://www.eskimo.com/~tiktok/faq02.html#7
Here is the text description that goes with the image I provided in my
first posting:
"2.PHOTO Baum, L. Frank. THE NEW WIZARD OF OZ. Illustrated with 16
color plates by W.W. Denslow + black & white text drawings highlighted
with green, orange, yellow & brown. 2nd edition, 2nd state(following
the Geo.M. Hill edition) Bobbs-Merrill (1903). For this edition
Denslow prepared a new title page, color end paper design and new
cover design, hence the addition of the word "new" to the title. Dark
green cloth with scarecrow design. Page edges and plate edges of page
32 badly chipped & re-inserted. Plate page 160 edges chipped &
repaired with archival tape, and poorly re-inserted. Inscription on
blank page dated Dec.25, 1908. Just Good. $375.00"
Bookstall: Oz Books (scroll to item 2)
http://www.bookstallsf.com/ozbooks.html
You can find much more information about the Bobbs-Merrill editions of
the book by perusing the higher-ranked results of this Google search:
"wizard of oz" "bobbs merrill"
://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004-01,GGLD:en&q=%22wizard+of+oz%22+%22bobbs+merrill%22
Search Strategy:
There is a whole lot of online information about the Baum book (not to
mention the movie), so my strategy was to design increasingly focused
Google searches that would zero in on the answer. Here are a few
examples:
"wizard of oz" "259pp OR 260pp"
://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004-01,GGLD:en&q=%22wizard+of+oz%22+%22259pp+OR+260pp%22
That one (and other variations on it) did not confirm the page count
of your edition, but it did lead to the Bobbs Merrill edition and lots
of general information about various editions.
"wizard of oz" "bobbs merrill"
://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004-01,GGLD:en&q=%22wizard+of+oz%22+%22bobbs+merrill%22
"wizard of oz" bobbs-merrill scarecrow cover
://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004-01,GGLD:en&q=%22wizard+of+oz%22+bobbs%2Dmerrill+scarecrow+cover
These (and several variations on them) led to the explicit reference
to the scarecrow on the cover and the other information on the edition
that gave me (and you) confidence that this was it, despite the lack
of reference to the publisher and the date in your copy.
If anything remains unclear, please ask for clarification before
rating the answer. I am glad that your first experience with Google
Answers has been a good one.
markj-ga |