Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Can plants live without animals? Why or why not? ecology ( Answered,   6 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Can plants live without animals? Why or why not? ecology
Category: Science
Asked by: permaculturepatty-ga
List Price: $4.50
Posted: 04 Aug 2002 09:51 PDT
Expires: 03 Sep 2002 09:51 PDT
Question ID: 50476
Can plants live without animals? Why or why not?
Answer  
Subject: Re: Can plants live without animals? Why or why not? ecology
Answered By: secret901-ga on 04 Aug 2002 10:23 PDT
 
Hi Patty,

Thank you for your interesting question.  As a first thought, it
appears that plants do not need animal to live.  After all, we animals
use plants for tons of purposes: food, wood, etc.

However, on closer examination, we shall see that many plants depend
on animals for their existence, and thus many of them would not be
able to survive without animals.

1) The Venus's-flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) is one of the best-known
examples of meat-eating plants.  It lives in areas where there are not
enough nutrients, thus it needs to trap animals to obtain the needed
nutrients.

2) Pollination in flowering plants depends on the help of animals. 
"As sedentary organisms, plants usually must enlist the services of
external agents for pollen transport."  Animals, especially bees,
pollinate plants by carrying pollen from one flower to another.

3) Seed dispersal also depends on animals.  Plants strive to make
their fruits as enticing as possible so that animals would eat their
plants and carry the seeds far away.

4) Browsing, or eating the young shoots, leaves, and twigs of plants
keep dominant species of plants in check.  Without browsing, more
dominant plants would take over and thus killing off the less dominant
ones.

So in conclusion, to a lesser extent, plants do rely on animals for
their survival.

Search strategy:
"plants need animals"

Sources:
http://www.seps.org/oracle/oracle.archive/Life_Science.Ecology/2001.08/000998160004.17260.html

http://www.hctf.ca/wild/resources/projectwild/activity.htm

Encyclopędia Britannica Online, "Venus's flytrap"
Encyclopędia Britannica Online, "Pollination"

Clarification of Answer by secret901-ga on 04 Aug 2002 10:24 PDT
If you need clarification, please request for it before rating the answer.
Thank you,
secret901-ga

Clarification of Answer by secret901-ga on 04 Aug 2002 10:46 PDT
Oops, I forgot to mention that animal decay turn into nutrients and
serve as nutrients for plants as well.

Clarification of Answer by secret901-ga on 04 Aug 2002 15:12 PDT
Thanks knowledge_seeker and jeremymiles for your input.  I have
overlooked the fact that animals produce CO2, which is essential in
photosynthesis. Also, it is true that plants existed before the first
animals appeared on Earth.  However, those plants are extremely
primitive.  As I have said before, many plants do depend on animals
for their existence, but many do not.  Plants depend on animals to a
lesser extent than do animals depend on plants.
Comments  
Subject: Re: Can plants live without animals? Why or why not? ecology
From: knowledge_seeker-ga on 04 Aug 2002 11:17 PDT
 
Not to mention the most obvious reason plants need animals ... we
exhale carbon dioxide (CO2) that plants need in order to "breathe." 
(they don't really "breathe" in the sense that we do, but they need
CO2 to make energy)

The converse is also true, they "exhale" or give off oxygen that we
need to breathe. Neither of us can live without the other.

-K~ (speaking for the Lorax today :-) )
Subject: Re: Can plants live without animals? Why or why not? ecology
From: jeremymiles-ga on 04 Aug 2002 14:51 PDT
 
I wouldn't disagree with anything said in the answers so far, but
don't forget that there were plants before there were animals, so the
short(est) answer must be 'Yes'.
Subject: Re: Can plants live without animals? Why or why not? ecology
From: egri_bikaver-ga on 06 Aug 2002 06:24 PDT
 
Jeremymiles-ga,

Are you sure that plants were here before animals?

A plant is an extremely complex lifeform composed of many specialized
cells.
Before the first plant there were common single-celled organisms such
as amoebas and bacteria. Both of these are classified as animals....

egri
Subject: Re: Can plants live without animals? Why or why not? ecology
From: cephalic-ga on 06 Aug 2002 12:57 PDT
 
Amoebas and Bacteria are not classified as animals.

See http://tolweb.org/tree?group=Eukaryotes&contgroup=Life

Also, if you would like a more in-depth discussion of phylogenetics see:

http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/exhibit/phylogeny.html

Best
Subject: Re: Can plants live without animals? Why or why not? ecology
From: zyx-ga on 09 Aug 2002 07:31 PDT
 
Eventhough it might sound most obvious that plants would need animals
as for their source of co2, it isn't actually so. Plants get their co2
from other plants, as they decay (slowly burn) when they die.
Chemicallys speaking a carbon-based tree combines with oxygen creating
carbon dioxide (burns). So the plants are quite self-sufficient with
their own cycle of co2.
Subject: Re: Can plants live without animals? Why or why not? ecology
From: ozguru-ga on 16 Aug 2002 23:19 PDT
 
Thanks to cephalic for reminding me there are more kingdoms than
plants and animals. :-)

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy