![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
cost of capital
Category: Business and Money Asked by: ad11-ga List Price: $100.00 |
Posted:
19 Apr 2005 10:24 PDT
Expires: 27 Apr 2005 03:20 PDT Question ID: 511391 |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: cost of capital
From: aetheist_conspiracy-ga on 20 Apr 2005 09:35 PDT |
A search on google for "cost of Capital" mne "domestic" yeilded the following: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- According to: http://flash.lakeheadu.ca/~pgreg/assignments/4079chapter11n.pdf Agency costs, political and foreign exchange risks, however, are higher for MNEs. MNE?s Cost of Capital Compared to Domestic Firms Recent empirical studies have shown that ² U.S.-based MNEs? WACC is generally higher than their domestic counterparts. ² U.S.-based MNEs? debt ratios are lower than their domestic counterparts. ² U.S.-based MNEs? have higher systematic risk than their domestic counterparts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From http://www.lancs.ac.uk/staff/ecarar/ib%20lecture%205.ppt Given imperfect world financial markets, MNEs arbitrage by borrowing money at low interest rates in capita-rich countries for use in capital-poor countries which have higher interest rates. MNEs therefore have access to cheaper capital than domestic firms in host-countries. and MNE activities are a geographically-diversified portfolio of income-earning assets. Their shareholders possess a diversified portfolio of international securities. MNE equity provides a relatively high rate of return for a low risk compared with local (domestic) firms. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.lib.unb.ca/Texts/CJRS/bin/get.cgi?directory=Summer98/&filename=forsans.htm Research confirms that the internationally diversified firm typically exhibits superior performance (or lower risk) linked to the degree of multinationality, and is able to enjoy a lower cost of capital compared with non-diversified firms, on account of its attractiveness to wealth holders (Clegg 1992). AC |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |