Google Answers Logo
View Question
Q: admissable evidence ( No Answer,   1 Comment )
Subject: admissable evidence
Category: Relationships and Society > Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual
Asked by: chappie-ga
List Price: $5.00
Posted: 29 Apr 2005 10:04 PDT
Expires: 29 May 2005 10:04 PDT
Question ID: 515831
Michael Jackson, accused of same sex child molestation, owns
photographs of naked boys; the judge will determine if the photos are
admissable as evidence of his predisposition.  If Jackson also owns
photos or paintings of naked women or of heterosexual acts, would the
defense have the right to place those in evidence? I'm interested in
the SELECTION of evidence by prosecutors, which one juror in the
current Philadelphia trial of a city official has objected to.
There is no answer at this time.

Subject: Re: admissable evidence
From: shockandawe-ga on 29 Apr 2005 10:57 PDT
Even if they were permitted, would the defense WANT to admit such evidence? 
Seems like it serves the prosecution just as well to paint him as an
equal oportunity "pervert" rather then just a specialized "pervert".

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  

Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy