![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Privacy vs Camera Phones
Category: Computers Asked by: afternoonjames-ga List Price: $45.00 |
Posted:
01 May 2005 12:27 PDT
Expires: 31 May 2005 12:27 PDT Question ID: 516557 |
I'm annoyed at seeing camera phones in the street. Most of the time I see someone with a camera phone, they have the lid open and they look like they're taping everyone who walks past. It would be great if someone could tell me how to avoid being photographed. 1) Is there a device that can trace the location of digital cameras and alert you when they are in use? 2) a) Is there any way to trace a photo once it's been uploaded to the internet? E.g. by doing a search on a colour pattern that might appear in the photo? b) Could you use some sort of 'steganographical clothing' to make the search possible, e.g. a baseball cap with a distinctive design? 3) How do you stop the photos from being taken in the first place? Thanks in advance. Rgrds, AfternoonJames PS I will tip $20 if you really can solve this problem. |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Privacy vs Camera Phones
From: dancethecon-ga on 01 May 2005 14:14 PDT |
I'm not up on the current laws, but as a former full-time photojournalist and commercial photographer, I used to know what was legal to photograph. I doubt it's changed much since the mid-to-late 1990s. ? If you're out in public, you can be photographed. No one needs to ask your permission. You can ask me to stop (and if I'm a nice person, I'd agree), but I can keep any photographs already taken. ? If you're in your home, you can be photographed if you're in view of a window or if you're in your yard. But a photographer can't go onto your property to do it (the photographer has to stay on public property, like a street or sidewalk), and the photographer can't use extraordinary means--for example, using a telephoto lens or climbing a tree. ? I would assume--this is a pure guess--that were I to take your photo in public, I'd have every right to put it on my non-commercial web site. There's no question that I could send it to friends in an e-mail ("Look at this great photo I took..."). That's not what you want to hear, I know. But there are limits to what a photographer can do with your unauthorized photograph. ? The person who takes your photograph without your permission cannot use it for any commercial use. That is, it cannot be used in advertising. It can be used in journalism, however. ? While it can be shown in a gallery or a museum--in the guise of art photography--the photographer's rights blur at this point, since the photograph can't be used in any advertising for the show. ? The photographer can't depict you in an especially embarrassing act. If I caught you picking your nose, for example, I couldn't show that photo anywhere, because it's not your normal look. (Sorry for a gross example, but it's a classic example for photo students.) I noticed that in question 2a you spell "colour" with the British spelling. Where do you live? What I've said applies to photography in the United States (Canada's laws are--or were--similar, I think). The UK and Australia might have different laws; I don't know. I'll leave your technology questions to a computer guru. Best wishes, dtc |
Subject:
Re: Privacy vs Camera Phones
From: xcarlx-ga on 01 May 2005 22:02 PDT |
Cameras are not new. Why the sudden paranoia over cameras attached to phones? |
Subject:
Re: Privacy vs Camera Phones
From: sangre_viento-ga on 03 May 2005 13:35 PDT |
In some places, such as locker rooms (YMCA) picture phones have been banned and must be left at the front desk. |
Subject:
Re: Privacy vs Camera Phones
From: scubajim-ga on 03 May 2005 16:04 PDT |
In Japan they passed a law that picture phones had to make a clearly audible sound when taking a picture. There was an epidemic of "upskirt" photo shots prior to the law. A lot of young women (Jr. High, and High School) have to wear skirts as part of a school uniform and the subways are very crowded during rush hour. You can see where I am going with this. Some places in Japan have subway car(s) just for women due to the groping problem. They really don't have much enforcement of laws against it. |
Subject:
Re: Privacy vs Camera Phones
From: bearitall-ga on 04 May 2005 15:07 PDT |
I have to say that when I first read afternoonjames's post I thought he was just being silly (sorry james), but then with scubajim's I can see where the problems lie. I'm sure we've all had spam at one time or another showing bodily parts. I use a sauna a lot and I have often seen a few in there doing what I assumed to be texts. For all I know my parts could be on show on the internet somewhere. (though I can't imagine mine would be of much interest to anyone). I think I'll mention it to the sauna owner even though I think I'll feel silly saying it, he might at least be aware enough to watch what members are actually doing with the phones. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |