![]() |
|
|
| Subject:
statistics
Category: Miscellaneous Asked by: tears_in_heaven-ga List Price: $3.00 |
Posted:
03 May 2005 11:55 PDT
Expires: 02 Jun 2005 11:55 PDT Question ID: 517282 |
|
| There is no answer at this time. |
|
| Subject:
Re: statistics
From: jack_of_few_trades-ga on 03 May 2005 12:55 PDT |
http://www.stat.tamu.edu/stat30x/notes/node66.html That page will walk you through how to work the problem as a binomial distribution. I'd do it for you, but then there wouldn't be any learning going on. The final answer will be .2244646%, so you can check your work. Best of luck to you! If you get stuck on any part of it feel free to ask. |
| Subject:
Re: statistics
From: jack_of_few_trades-ga on 04 May 2005 04:57 PDT |
Hmmm, sorry that didn't work out for you yet. I worked the problem another way to make sure the answer was right and I got the same answer. The only things I know to suggest (since I can't see your work) is 1) Assign all the variables before working through the problem. 2) Be sure that the probability of success is right (ie if you're looking for 5 ambulances being repaired then 5% is your "probability of success" (as opposed to 95% which it would be if you were looking for 15 ambulances that are in working order). 3) Remember when calculating that 5% = .05 and 95% = .95 I hope that helps! The answer for 7 ambulances under repair is .0031089%. |
| Subject:
Re: statistics
From: tears_in_heaven-ga on 05 May 2005 12:52 PDT |
actually i get the same answers. Let me explain the context to this question. I work for the local government which provides emergency services in our city. The Emergency Services department is advocating building 20 parking bays for our fleet of ambulances and having 100% redundancy i.e if there are 20 ambulances being used during peak hours there would be equivalent amount of ambulances parked in the bays to provide redundancies. Obviously this has implications in terms of extra cost of buying vehicles and capital requirements to build additional bays. I'm trying to figure out with say 85%,90%,95% availability factor for such ambulances what is the likelihood that 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more etc. ambulances would be needed and on that basis how many ambulances should be kept in reserve. I guess my second question related to this would be whether it is reasonable to assume "availability" of amublances as a percentage....i.e 85%. The reason i ask is because the binomial distribution is used for binary events which have a yes or no result, e.g flipping a coin results in heads or tails. However the avialability of each ambulance will (or should) follow a normal distribution curve (or some other curve), so the actual availability may be .85 with a standard deviation of .02 etc....in this case is it reasonable to still model the problem as a binomial distribution to get a simplistic answer? I guess the most appropriate way of modeling this would by via simulations models? Do you agree? |
| Subject:
Re: statistics
From: jack_of_few_trades-ga on 05 May 2005 13:54 PDT |
I think a binomial could work for you, but a simple reality check is the best way to go here. You know from experience how many ambulances get used and how often they are in for repair. Take the most you have ever had a need for in the past and there is a safe number to go with. If you're willing to take on a slightly greater risk of not having enough then consider having 1 less and take a look at how many days in the last few years there would have been a shortfall with that number. If you want less risk then add 1 or 2 ambulances to that number (keeping in mind that they are useless if you don't have the people to man them). If the past data on ambulance use isn't available then you should definately call to several different communities to find out how many ambulances they use and ask for any statistics they have (keeping in mind the number of people they service). |
| Subject:
Re: statistics
From: tears_in_heaven-ga on 05 May 2005 20:36 PDT |
I asked the same question in another thread, unfortunately the answers were not very forthcoming... http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=514959 I agree, its worth asking and phoning other communities, but it seems that most communities do not measure redundancy in fleets in such a manner. This kind of information is hard to find. i think some kind of theoretical basis is important, i'm not too sure if we have the data to indicate down time. Anyways thanks for your help. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
| Search Google Answers for |
| Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |