Google Answers: Current security strategy violating international law?

View Question

Q: Current security strategy violating international law? ( No Answer, 0 Comments )

Question

Subject: Current security strategy violating international law?
Category: Relationships and Society > Government
Asked by: telarium-ga
List Price: $10.00

Posted: 03 May 2005 20:08 PDT
Expires: 03 May 2005 20:13 PDT
Question ID: 517465

In The National Security Strategy of the United States of America
(September 2002), it states, "As a matter of common sense and
self-defense, America will act against such emerging threats before
they are fully formed."

How does this notion of prevention (or possibly preemtion) violate
international law?

I'm looking for a set of specific international laws to justify the argument.

Answer

There is no answer at this time.

Comments

There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.

Search Google Answers for

Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy