|
|
Subject:
Comparing Home Video Editing Software
Category: Computers > Software Asked by: gwj-ga List Price: $100.00 |
Posted:
08 Aug 2002 00:14 PDT
Expires: 07 Sep 2002 00:14 PDT Question ID: 52075 |
I want to compare video editing software packages that include a video card for a PC. I want compaison against a list of desirable qualities concerning both video and audio. I want to spend up to $600 USD. | |
| |
|
|
Subject:
Re: Comparing Home Video Editing Software
Answered By: vinods-ga on 08 Aug 2002 07:29 PDT Rated: |
hello, please look up URL http://www.smartdv.co.uk/cardcompare.htm this is a partial list of available video editing h/w and s/w. I will follow up with more details soon. warm regards vinod-ga | |
| |
| |
|
gwj-ga rated this answer: |
|
Subject:
Re: Comparing Home Video Editing Software
From: vinods-ga on 08 Aug 2002 08:19 PDT |
Hi, The Matrox RT.X10 has both Firewire and Analog input/outputs. This means you can take in stuff from say, a VHS or SVHS source and also directly transfer your edited material into a VHS cassette, instead of dumping on to DV and then transferring to VHS. This saves a lot of time. In my humble opinion, I see this package as the best for your purpose. If you get to save some money on the card, you could invest in a 7200rpm hard drive. In any case it will be good for you to use a separate hard drive for your data (audio and video) and keep the software and Operating System in the other existing hard disk. This will definitely improve overall performance of your system during the editing process. Matrox recommends this, but you can also do without it, of course at the cost of lesser performance... One more thing... The Matrox card is a PCI card which means you still use your AGP (Accelerated Graphics Processor) slot in your motherboard for the existing video card. later you can add a dual-head display card like the Matrox G450 display card. This way you can have two monitors - one for the software and the other for the picture being edited. warm regards vinod-ga |
Subject:
Comparison articles, Sony cameras, "Effects"
From: ulu-ga on 08 Aug 2002 12:40 PDT |
Here is a comparison between various software packages. http://common.ziffdavisinternet.com/download/0/1414/videoediting.pdf http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,2181,00.asp Most Sony video cameras will convert between analog video and DV (you might need to record on tape first). This would mean you don't need a separate conversion card (just use firewire). (I see vinods mentioned this) Concerning "rendering" and "real-time", this relates to doing effects with the DV. Effects could be anything from complex 3D manipulation to simple dissolves. If you are only doing "cuts-only", where you are just assembling clips together, the performance for effects is not needed. After a short time, you would probably want to add effects to your videos. Making DVDs require an extra compression step. Most of the time that is performed with software on home systems, but that is changing rapidly. I would agree with vinods that a good fast separate large drive would be worthwhile (I like to shoot hours of video and load it all on). |
Subject:
Re: Comparing Home Video Editing Software
From: action-ga on 27 Nov 2002 13:01 PST |
The only reason I'm commenting is because I've been down this road and thought you might like my $.02 worth. I'm not an expert, in fact I just posted a question about DV/RT hardware. I would recommend starting with Pinnacle Studio software only for now. I would also recommend one of the Western-Digital "special edition" hard drives. The special edition just means it has an 8mb buffer instead of 2mb. They make sizes from 80 to 200gb. Raw DV capture is huge and will consume a lot of disk space. The 8mb buffer will help avoid "dropping" frames -- both capturing and sending the video back to tape. Dropped frames when sending the video back to tape can be completely unacceptable. This is because it usually always affects the audio and can make your best "home video" effort irritating to watch. (I'm speaking from experience.) From what I read from vinods-ga, later you may want to upgrade to the RT.X10 which is where I am in my "journey." This will allow you to capture your analog video without having to record it onto your dv camcorder first. My hope is that this hardware will work (speed up rendering) in Pinnacle Studio, too. (No answer yet) Pinnacle Studio is very fast and easy to use -- and powerful. It is probably all I need and might be all you need, too. Capturing everything in DV format means it only has to render the transitions and titles. I've found Adobe Premiere extremely difficult to learn but very powerful. It is very expensive ($600, I think) and it is included with the Matrox x10 so that's an added bonus of getting the x10. Good luck. -Jack |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |