Clarification of Answer by
websearcher-ga
on
15 May 2005 06:15 PDT
Hi macromicromini:
Thanks for the clarification requestion.
I've spent some more time on this search for you - it's a real tough
one! Here's all the other places I found mention of this technique:
A rose by any other name would smell as sweet
URL: http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/forum/viewforum.php?forum_id=306&since=20050313
Quote: "By anchoring the book in a real place and manipulating small
details and creating characters (also based off of real people,
Middlesex was based off of Herculine Barbin) it seems more realistic,
more believable. Herculine Barbin, on the other hand, seems less
believable, even though it is a memoir. I understand that leaving
places nameless or denoting them with an X or such was a stylistic
choice from earlier times (I know it si done in Jane Eyre? I think
Austen does it as well) but, for me, it made the book more real to
have entire names, especially ones that were familiar."
Why all those blanks?
URL: http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/bronte/cbronte/blanks.html
Quote: "On 15 February 2002, Margaret Sheils wrote with the following
query: "I am currently reading Jane Eyre (2nd ed.), and I have no one
else to ask. Are the references to _____shire, something the editors
or author left blank? All throughout chapter X this omission occurs.
GPL: This is standard eighteenth- and nineteenth-century practice to
create a sense of realism: the author leaves out the name of the
country or person, thus pretending it is a real one and that he or she
does not wish to intrude upon the privacy of real people."
I know these quotes are not extremely "scholarly", but it was the best
I could do. I tried dozens and dozens of different search criteria.
websearcher