|
|
Subject:
Finance
Category: Business and Money > Finance Asked by: muffy9999-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
16 May 2005 08:16 PDT
Expires: 15 Jun 2005 08:16 PDT Question ID: 522190 |
Why is the cost of new common stock (kn) higher than the cost of retained earnings (Ke)? |
|
Subject:
Re: Finance
Answered By: livioflores-ga on 16 May 2005 09:45 PDT Rated: |
Hi!! Flotation Cost Definition: "The costs associated with the issuance of new securities. Flotation costs include both the underwriting spread and the costs incurred by the issuing company from the offering. Expressed as a portion of gross proceeds, costs generally increase as risks associated with the issue increase, or the size of the offering decreases." http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/flotationcost.asp The existence of flotation costs on new common stock is the only difference between the cost of retained earnings and the cost of new common stock. See the formulas: Cost of New Common Stock = g + Div_0 / P_0*(1-Fc) Cost of Retained Earnings = g + Div_0 / P_0 Where: Div_0 = the first year dividend P_0 = current market price g = growth rate of dividend Fc = flotation cost Since Div_0/P_0 term in the cost of new common stock formula is divided by a number between 0 and 1 the result is a higher number, this lead us to the following conclusion: The Cost of New Common Stock is the same as the cost of retained earnings except it is higher due to flotation costs. Hope that this helps you. Feel free to request for a clarification if you need it. Regards. livioflores-ga |
muffy9999-ga rated this answer: |
|
There are no comments at this time. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |