|
|
Subject:
Unobtrusive photography
Category: Arts and Entertainment > Visual Arts Asked by: witness74-ga List Price: $4.00 |
Posted:
18 May 2005 18:54 PDT
Expires: 17 Jun 2005 18:54 PDT Question ID: 523164 |
I am interested in being able to take natural pictures of people in public. For example I have seen photos in a subway where the subject seems completely unaware of the camera. What are the keys to doing unobtrusive photography? It seems like a wide-angle fixed lens camera would be able to give a very quick shot but you still have to get the camera out, bring it to your face and shoot. It would be quicker if the camera is already out but then people are going to be aware of it. The disguised cameras (lighters) probably won't solve the problem because they don't have qood quality (I would like to print). And you still have to do camera motions. It must be something in people's technique... | |
| |
|
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Unobtrusive photography
From: justaskscott-ga on 18 May 2005 19:08 PDT |
You might be interested in this comment by famed Life magazine photographer Alfred Eisenstadt: "... He used a 2 1/4" Rolleiflex 'because you can hold a Rolleiflex without raising it to your eye; so they didn't see me taking the pictures.' Eisenstaedt was speaking of the time he photographed American soldiers saying farewell to their wives and sweethearts in 1944 on assignment for Life. 'I just kept motionless like a statue.' he said. 'They never saw me clicking away. For the kind of photography I do, one has to be very unobtrusive and to blend in with the crowd.'" "Alfred Eisenstadt," by Ray Zone ArtScene http://artscenecal.com/ArticlesFile/Archive/Articles1997/Articles0397/AEisenstaedt.html |
Subject:
Re: Unobtrusive photography
From: myoarin-ga on 20 May 2005 18:27 PDT |
A digital camera - no shutter noise - and with enough pixels you can keep at wide angle and not have to aim carefully, doing your cropping at home. Cell phone with camera function - not such good quality, but less obtrusive. |
Subject:
Re: Unobtrusive photography
From: gregorygardner-ga on 21 May 2005 11:45 PDT |
One key is using a camera with a waist-level finder. That is, instead of a viewfinder that you hold up to your eye, letting the world know you are taking a picture, you hold the camera at waist level, and look down into it. There are many different kinds of cameras with waist-level finders -- the older Nikon coolpix with the "swivel" design let you do this. Many older medium-format professional cameras have this as well. As many pros move to digital, you can get used version cheaply on ebay and other places -- Rolleiflex TLRs, Hasselblads, Mamiya RBs and RZs and other professional, medium format cameras all have WLFs. Another technique is pre-focusing on a zone with manual focus, wait for something interesting to happen in that zone, and to quickly bring the (traditional) camera up to your face, and immediately take the picture. This technique requires some practice, but many of the best street photographers (Henri Cartier-Bresson, in particular) used this technique with great success. |
Subject:
Re: Unobtrusive photography
From: witness74-ga on 18 Jun 2005 16:44 PDT |
The shutter release one is brilliant. To my mind you are also not hiding the camera since it is out in the open. I'd also like to note that I've been having some luck shooting from the waist without a finder. With a wide-angle and general direction, to some degree I don't need to compose the shot. I was also reading this article by photojournalist Alex Majoli ( http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-6468-7844 ) where he talks about the advantages of using a small digital camera including silence and large depth of field. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |