Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Unobtrusive photography ( No Answer,   4 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Unobtrusive photography
Category: Arts and Entertainment > Visual Arts
Asked by: witness74-ga
List Price: $4.00
Posted: 18 May 2005 18:54 PDT
Expires: 17 Jun 2005 18:54 PDT
Question ID: 523164
I am interested in being able to take natural pictures of people in
public. For example I have seen photos in a subway where the subject
seems completely unaware of the camera.
What are the keys to doing unobtrusive photography?
It seems like a wide-angle fixed lens camera would be able to give a
very quick shot but you still have to get the camera out, bring it to
your face and shoot. It would be quicker if the camera is already out
but then people are going to be aware of it.
The disguised cameras (lighters) probably won't solve the problem
because they don't have qood quality (I would like to print). And you
still have to do camera motions.
It must be something in people's technique...

Request for Question Clarification by pafalafa-ga on 18 May 2005 19:58 PDT
This is one option...sneaky, but effective:


http://www.bugeyedigital.com/product_main/bow-vl144.html



Is this the sort of thing you're looking for?

Clarification of Question by witness74-ga on 28 May 2005 14:00 PDT
That's a good answer. 
I didn't specify that I prefer to use a small digital camera because I
can take it anywhere. These cameras tend to have much smaller threads
then the device you mentioned. I might get a coolpix. there are some
newer cameras with swivel LCD but they are not pocket size like my
S40.
Thank you everyone
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
Subject: Re: Unobtrusive photography
From: justaskscott-ga on 18 May 2005 19:08 PDT
 
You might be interested in this comment by famed Life magazine
photographer Alfred Eisenstadt:

"... He used a 2 1/4" Rolleiflex 'because you can hold a Rolleiflex
without raising it to your eye; so they didn't see me taking the
pictures.'  Eisenstaedt was speaking of the time he photographed
American soldiers saying farewell to their wives and sweethearts in
1944 on assignment for Life. 'I just kept motionless like a statue.'
he said.  'They never saw me clicking away.  For the kind of
photography I do, one has to be very unobtrusive and to blend in with
the crowd.'"

"Alfred Eisenstadt," by Ray Zone
ArtScene
http://artscenecal.com/ArticlesFile/Archive/Articles1997/Articles0397/AEisenstaedt.html
Subject: Re: Unobtrusive photography
From: myoarin-ga on 20 May 2005 18:27 PDT
 
A digital camera  - no shutter noise -  and with enough pixels you can
keep at wide angle and not have to aim carefully, doing your cropping
at home.

Cell phone with camera function  - not such good quality, but less obtrusive.
Subject: Re: Unobtrusive photography
From: gregorygardner-ga on 21 May 2005 11:45 PDT
 
One key is using a camera with a waist-level finder.  That is, instead
of a viewfinder that you hold up to your eye, letting the world know
you are taking a picture, you hold the camera at waist level, and look
down into it.  There are many different kinds of cameras with
waist-level finders -- the older Nikon coolpix with the "swivel"
design let you do this.  Many older medium-format professional cameras
have this as well.  As many pros move to digital, you can get used
version cheaply on ebay and other places -- Rolleiflex TLRs,
Hasselblads, Mamiya RBs and RZs and other professional, medium format
cameras all have WLFs.

Another technique is pre-focusing on a zone with manual focus, wait
for something interesting to happen in that zone, and to quickly bring
the (traditional) camera up to your face, and immediately take the
picture.  This technique requires some practice, but many of the best
street photographers (Henri Cartier-Bresson, in particular) used this
technique with great success.
Subject: Re: Unobtrusive photography
From: witness74-ga on 18 Jun 2005 16:44 PDT
 
The shutter release one is brilliant. To my mind you are also not
hiding the camera since it is out in the open.
I'd also like to note that I've been having some luck shooting from
the waist without a finder. With a wide-angle and general direction,
to some degree I don't need to compose the shot.
I was also reading this article by photojournalist Alex Majoli (
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-6468-7844 )
where he talks about the advantages of using a small digital camera
including silence and large depth of field.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy