![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
To sell or not to sell?
Category: Family and Home > Home Asked by: vla-ga List Price: $25.00 |
Posted:
28 May 2005 14:28 PDT
Expires: 27 Jun 2005 14:28 PDT Question ID: 526714 |
My house has appreciated three times since I bought it. What should I do with it now considering housing bubble situation in San Francisco Bay Area? Option 1 - Sell, buy a more expansive place. Option 2 - Sell, buy a smaller place, keep cash. Option 3 - Rent, buy another house using equity loan. Option 4 - Do nothing. |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: To sell or not to sell?
From: borisshah-ga on 28 May 2005 20:06 PDT |
I would try and talk to your local real estate agency or check historical records. But the best thing that you could do is examine your own situation. Are you happy to move, are you sure you can find another house???. If the bubble does burst, then Option 1 starts to look like a disaster. Sit down and talk with your family is the best advice I can give you. Best of Luck. |
Subject:
Re: To sell or not to sell?
From: myoarin-ga on 29 May 2005 16:14 PDT |
Hi Vla-ga, That sounds like good advice, though I suspect that a real estate agent will have lots of reasons why he thinks it is advisable to sell: It's his business. You know the area you live in. Have the prices just gone up - as they have elsewhere? Or has the area gone up-market? Are houses being improved or expanded, more young professionals moving in, that sort of thing? People talk about the "bubble", but SF is a unique area, and more people want to live there, and there just isn't any more land. I would estimate that if your area is "improving", it will survive the "bubble" - should there be one - better than others. But as you know, this is no professional advice. Tax is another consideration (and one often asked about here). If you have grown children, depending on your financial situation, gifting, selling or renting to them could be a possibility, but one that should be discussed in depth with tax savvy lawyer, maybe even gifting or selling and renting from them, again, very much dependent on your financial situation. Good luck, Myoarin |
Subject:
Re: To sell or not to sell?
From: alesmith-ga on 30 May 2005 02:19 PDT |
My advice: You seem to (wisely) be looking to put your money into the best possible investment (as opposed to being driven by "I love this house" or "I want to move to...". etc.) So, put your money into what where you think you will get the best return. Is that SF? I don't think so. Like you say, it's been hot for a while now. If I were you, I would look at Reno, and also at the California Valley. I believe that houses in these areas are very good investments right now. But, selling your house would give you alot of cash, I bet. Alot more than you need to buy buy a house in Reno or the valley. So maybe Option 3 is best. Keep the SF house as a good investment, if not a particualarly upwardly-mobile one. Put cash into an investment property elsewhere. With the kind of net worth you probably have as a long-time Bay Area homeowner, owning more than one property is a wise idea. Either way, I tink #2 and #4 are the worst ideas. With mortgage rates where they are now, it's not the time to stop borrowing and sit on cash. That's just my advice, but I do practice what I preach. I am from the Bay Area, and have just purchased homes in Reno and Calexico as investments. -Dave |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |