![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
converting from 320kbps to variable bit rate
Category: Computers > Software Asked by: eddiejanzer-ga List Price: $2.00 |
Posted:
09 Aug 2002 13:08 PDT
Expires: 08 Sep 2002 13:08 PDT Question ID: 52731 |
I have my mp3 music recorded at 320 kbps (on a hard drive). I want to batch convert this music to VBR. I am considering I am considering Batch Converter from Sonic Foundry at a 120 dollars for the program. I already have the music at 320 kbps My question is this...(I am archiving at a high quality...) is converting from 320 to vbr degrading the quality much more than if I recorded wave to vbr My goal is to have the music at high quality and be free of cd's and be able to shrink the size for my laptop or for friends and portable players |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: converting from 320kbps to variable bit rate
From: alienintelligence-ga on 09 Aug 2002 13:50 PDT |
Hi eddiejanzer... Just as a comment... saving as VBR, no matter what will degrade the sonic headroom of the recording because you are expecting the bitrate to increase in areas of greater musical detail. While the bitrate is ramping up, you will have sonic loss at the edge of the transfer in rates. And this is down here as a comment, because I've gotten into alot of arguments regarding this ;0) It's a pretty even camp on both sides of the VBR discussion. I think the best way for you to tell is listening to the same recording, 3 different ways. CD first, then 320k then VBR. If YOU can't tell... then does it really matter? If you're worried about others noticing... leave it at 320k. Some people say they can notice the differences above 192k, etc... I wouldn't mind having the ears they think they have ;-) -AI |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |