![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Driving on the shoulder in California
Category: Relationships and Society > Law Asked by: cadriver-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
31 May 2005 20:40 PDT
Expires: 30 Jun 2005 20:40 PDT Question ID: 527976 |
I was cited for passing on the shoulder of the freeway in California. The facts are, however, that I was not passing. I have just come up ramp and could not enter the traffic becuase there was a traffic jam. And, there was another ramp very close. So, without the entering the freeway traffic I was going to take another ramp. So, from one ramp to another ramp without entering the freeway traffic. That involved driving on the shoulder. Is it really a traffic vialoations? If there is, it sure is very unfair. Once again, I was not passing, the shoulder was paved and I have never entered the freeway. |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Driving on the shoulder in California
From: fishinca-ga on 31 May 2005 20:52 PDT |
Yes its a traffic violation. Unless you have an emergency, you shouldn't be on the shoulder. If you couldn't enter the freeway, you should have stopped and waited for an opening. Unlikely the judge will favor you on this one. Could be worth a shot fighting it. |
Subject:
Re: Driving on the shoulder in California
From: cadriver-ga on 31 May 2005 20:59 PDT |
What is the emergency? I think the "emergency" applies on if you are initially on the freeway. I, however, never entered the freeway. Also, there was a construction work recently which gave me a confusion that I can drive in the lane I was driving and be clear. It appeared that I should have waited and entered the busy lane and then exit from it. Well, I have not entered and drivers would not let me. Why my driving is a vialotion if I removed myself from traffic? I think it is very unfair! |
Subject:
Re: Driving on the shoulder in California
From: cadriver-ga on 31 May 2005 21:26 PDT |
I want to add one thing here. I would want very much to promote to vote NO on increasing taxes and pay more to policemen in LA, CA. This concerns traffic policemen only. I think they are doing very bad job by citing people unjust. And, I would not pay to LA traffic policemen a cent from my pocket! I know I have to but increasing taxes? That is an Absurd! Also, there should be a law that states if a traffic policeman is citing one person then he can not cite another person at the same time! This policeman of mine was not just watching then he citied me. Why am I paying taxes??? |
Subject:
Re: Driving on the shoulder in California
From: hummer-ga on 01 Jun 2005 05:33 PDT |
Hi cadriver, The area of the road you describe is the "auxiliary lane" and not the "shoulder" (it's for merging and not for emergencies). Ofcourse, alot depends on how far you travelled on the auxiliary lane before reaching the exit ramp and your speed, but you may have a case. "An auxiliary lane along a highway [A major road for any form of motor transport] or motorway [A broad highway designed for high-speed traffic] connects slip roads, with the entrance ramp [An inclined surface or roadway that moves traffic from one level to another] or acceleration lane from one interchange [Mutual interaction; the activity of interchanging or reciprocating] leading to the exit ramp or deceleration lane of the next." http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/encyclopedia/l/la/lane.htm "The project includes extending carpool lanes farther into Placer County and adding auxiliary lanes, which are essentially lanes that are extensions of onramps and offramps. With auxiliary lanes, you can get up to freeway speed and merge in so you're not slowing down traffic. It just helps the (highway) operate better." http://www.sacbee.com/content/politics/local_government/story/12813428p-13663673c.html Good luck, hummer |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |