Here's the deal. Nevada has jurisdiction under United States law to
enact the divorce. Under Federal Full Faith and Credit standards, a
state need only have personal jurisdiction (that is, put simply
judicial power) over one of the parties to a marriage in order to
sever it. It doesn't matter in what state or country it was
celebrated, or what citizenship, nationality, height or color the
parties are. So if your uncle satisfies the Nevada requirements (a
very short residency period), and Nevada has Personal Jurisdiction
over him (which it does, because HE is making the filing) he can get a
domestically enforceable divorce.
BUT, in the US we have what's called "divisible divorce." Full faith
and credit would require any state (or territory) to recognize the
divorce decree, but the Nevada court needs personal jurisdiction over
BOTH parties to divide up the property. Since your aunt doesn't live
in Nevada and isn't going there soon, the Nevada court won't divide up
the property. In a purely domestic matter, your uncle would take the
judgment back to Pennsylvania or wherever, and the court there would
recognize the judgment (even if the divorce would be unattainable
under PA law), and divide up property.
So what does this mean? At best, your uncle has a decree of divorce
valid in the United States. But that does not mean, by any means,
that the Phillipines (the only country, according to your example,
capable of exercising personal jurisdiction over your aunt in order to
divide up property), will recognize it. It is purely a matter of
Phillipine law, and they are not bound by US notions of full faith and
credit. The web seems to think that it will not be recognized, unless
your uncle is not a Phillipino
(www.asiatour.com/philippines/e-02trav/ep-tra10_e.htm). Again, it is
a matter of Phillipine, not US law, and I have no idea what goes on
over there. |