View Question
Q: Finance: Weighted Average Cost of Capital ( Answered ,   0 Comments )
 Question
 Subject: Finance: Weighted Average Cost of Capital Category: Business and Money > Finance Asked by: propellor1-ga List Price: \$50.00 Posted: 09 Jun 2005 21:33 PDT Expires: 09 Jul 2005 21:33 PDT Question ID: 531678
 ```How would I calculate a public company's weighted average cost of capital on the fly; first from a publicly available (web) source and second from a private (paid) source? I believe it is a blend of a company's debt, equity and something to do with its beta relative to the risk-free rate.```
 ```Dear propellor1, You're right, the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) blends a company's cost of debt and cost of equity into a single measure. It takes into account the respective proportions of debt and equity in the overall capital funding, hence the "weighted average" part. The basic formula for WACC is the following. WACC = E/V * R_e + D/V * R_d * (1 - T_c) In this formula, E denotes the value of the firm's equity and D the value firm's debt, while V is the sum E+D. So E/V and D/V are just the proportions of equity and debt, respectively, in the sum of equity and debt. R_e is the cost of equity, and this is where the company's beta comes in. As you may know, the beta expresses the degree to which a company's stock is affected by movements in the overall stock market. A beta of 1 means that its stock moves in tandem with the market, a beta less than 1 means that it is more stable than the market, and a beta greater than 1 means that it is more volatile than the market. Here is the formula for calculating the cost of equity, or rather for estimating it, since this is an inexact science. R_e = R_f + beta * (R_m - R_f) The R_f here is the risk-free rate, or the rate of interest accruing to essentially risk-free investments. A common measure used for R_f is the interest rate on US Treasury bills. The R_m refers to the market rate, which is the interest to be gained from investing in the stock market. The number used for R_m is computed from historic stock-exchange data. The difference R_m-R_f is called the equity market risk premium (EMRP), since it represents the extra risk an investor takes on by investing in stocks rather than something like T-bills. Now let's return to the WACC formula, where we have two more symbols left to explain. R_d is the cost of debt, meaning the average interest rate that the company in question is paying on its debts. Because corporate interest payments are tax-deductible, we should adjust the cost of debt to reflect the degree of tax savings. That is the purpose of the final symbol, T_c, denoting the corporate tax rate. So in order to work out the WACC for a given company, you need to find or estimate four measures specific to that company. You must know E, the value of the firm's equity; D, the value of its debt; R_c, the cost of its debt; and beta, its stock volatility. Then there are three numbers to plug in that do not vary with the company. These are R_f, the risk-free rate; R_m, the market rate; and T_c, the corporate tax rate. All other values in the WACC formula follow from these numbers. Adding E to D gives you V, and applying the second formula above lets you compute R_e. The chief difficulty you will have in calculating WACC for a given company is finding out its E, D, R_c, and beta measures. The first three of these can usually be found in the company's annual report. The beta is best computed by sophisticated mathematical models, which is why subscription services such as Barra and Bloomberg charge for their beta estimates. If you find that any of the above is unclear or incorrect, please advise me through a Clarification Request so that I have the opportunity to fully meet your needs. Regards, leapinglizard``` Request for Answer Clarification by propellor1-ga on 10 Jun 2005 17:40 PDT ```The calc's are good so are you saying that the calculation cannot be generated on the fly in a scenario where I had a list of 25 companies? Is there a way to find a consistent place (or places) where I can find the elements to calculate WACC? That's my real reason. I want to know for sure I can find it in those places. Sorry for the clarification but where and consitency is why I posed the question. WACC is relatively easy. Thanks in advance for your help.``` Clarification of Answer by leapinglizard-ga on 12 Jun 2005 15:03 PDT ```You can obtain the beta, total debt, and total equity figures for most public companies from Yahoo! Finance. Yahoo! Finance: Home http://finance.yahoo.com/ You'll need a free Yahoo! account to log into this service. Once you've done so, enter a company's ticker symbol at the top of the page in the blue horizontal band. If you don't know the ticker symbol, use the "Symbol Lookup" link to search for it based on the company name. Once the summary page comes up, click on "Key Statistics" in the column at left, under the "Company" heading. You should now be able to find the beta under "Trading Information" and the total debt under "Balance Sheet". There is also a figure marked "Total Debt/Equity" -- divide the total debt by this number to find the total equity. Now you know the E, D, and beta measures for the company. The cost of debt, R_d -- not R_c as I erroneously wrote in several places above -- is not listed, nor can it be determined without an intimate knowledge of the company's financing. You should assume that the company borrows at market rates, and use the prevailing market rate as a reasonable estimate for R_d. The only more consistent source of technical company information would be a paid service, the most popular of which is Bloomberg. Many universities have Bloomberg terminals installed in their libraries. You might like to check by calling your local universities' libraries and business schools. If there is a Bloomberg terminal, a librarian will most likely be available to help you use it. For instance, here are instructions on finding betas with Bloomberg. University of Washington: Finding Historical Beta on Bloomberg http://www.lib.washington.edu/business/guides/beta.html Bloomberg subscriptions are so expensive that only institutional customers and the wealthiest individuals can afford them. That is why Yahoo! Finance is such an attractive option, although I frankly don't know just how broad its coverage is. You should try it out for some companies you're interested in and see for yourself. leapinglizard```
 propellor1-ga rated this answer: ```Great knowledge. I wanted too much, I know now. But great feedback and timely. Thanks and this is an answer worth paying for.```