Hi! Thanks for the question.
Please take note that before providing a rating; please ask for
clarification if you will need further assistance in the answers I
have provided below.
This website from Canada provides a list of different industries that
thrive on wetlands.
You may want to take these lists into consideration as you go about
planning the usage of your property.
-------------------
1. Peat Moss & other by-products
?Canadian peat is used not only as raw material for a garden soil
conditioner but can be processed into a number of products such as
peat pots, boards and pellets for nurseries, specialized soil mixes,
industrial absorbent material, charcoal and filtration material, and
insulation.?
2. Cranberries Harvesting and by-products
?There is a multitude of low to high-end value-added products that
exist or await invention such as cranberry liqueurs, cattail flour,
wastewater treatment units, wild rice popcorn, crafts and artwork,
books, pharmaceutical and related products, contaminant-free durable
construction material for wetland trail boardwalks, and mosquito and
black fly protection products.?
3. Recreation and Tourist Spot
?Significant local cultural opportunities from waterfowl festivals to
natural history beauty contents have arisen in relation to such local
wetland resources and recreational interests in many of our small
towns across the land. Some activities revolve around celebrating
World Wetlands Day and World Bog Day.?
Source: ?Canada' s Wetland Industry?
http://www.uwwrc.net/web/wetlandsrc/cat/case_studies/case_studies-1035574235306
-------------------
The Michigan EPA website provides the following economic values of wetlands.
1. Shellfish Industry
2. Recreational Fishing
3. Hunting
4. Fur Trapping
5. Commercial Fishing
6. Bird Watching
7. Nature Photography
?Economic Benefits of Wetlands?
http://www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/facts/fact4.html
-----------------
Our next two benefits provide discussions of additional possible
ventures you may want to look at for your wetlands.
8. Agriculture
?The economic importance of crops and pastures grown on wetland soils,
is substantial. Conservative estimates from South Africa are that the
quantity of hay produced in wetlands, for example, ranges between
10-15 tons of dry matter per hectare per year. This yield can be
substantially increased if appropriate management practices are
applied and, after being fed to livestock, the value of each hectare
of wetland under pasture production can go up tenfold.?
?The Values and Benefits of Wetlands?
http://www.nctwr.org.au/publications/valueandbenefits.html#socio-economic
9. Wetlands Mitigation Banking
You may also want to take a look at the concept of Wetlands Mitigation Banking.
?An Introduction to Wetlands Mitigation Banking?
http://www.gcglaw.com/resources/enviro/wetlands1.html
?NATIONAL WETLAND MITIGATION BANKING STUDY?
http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/iwr/pdf/92wmb1.pdf
Search terms used:
Wetlands industry sectors ?economic benefits?
I hope these links would be helpful to your research. Before rating
this answer, please ask for a clarification if you have a question or
if you would need further information.
Regards,
Easterangel-ga
Google Answers Researcher |
Request for Answer Clarification by
joshablett-ga
on
24 Jun 2005 08:00 PDT
Hi... thank you for the thoughtful and well-written response. I will
try to reciprocate. I probably should have told you about some of the
research I've already done, but I deliberately didn't want to put
limits on the research that you would do.
Unfortunately, the nature of the land makes most of the ideas you
suggest untenable. Generally speaking, the land is fairly dry, with
no running water; it is only classified as wetlands based on the
vegetation that can be found there. That rules out any of the ideas
that require water (e.g., cranberries, waterfowl, shellfish, fishing).
The land is also not next to any particularly large, wooded areas, and
I believe that this would limit its value as a tourist definition
(e.g., bird watching, nature photography). I think it's even less
likely that this would have tourist value due to the fact that there
are a fair number of public spaces close by, and I don't know how this
would become a money-making proposition. I also don?t think hunting
is feasible, as (a) I don?t see how I could make money from that and
(b) there is little interesting game in the area.
I have also researched wetlands mitigation banking. From this
newsletter (http://www.goldmanenvironmental.com/newsletters/sept04.html),
it sounds like a pilot program was launched in the Taunton River area
in Massachusetts, but I?m not able to find any additional information
about what success criteria the state will use in determining if and
when they should expand the program.
I have also researched agriculture (e.g., standard agriculture, peat
moss). All of the reading I have done at
http://www.mass.gov/dep/brp/ww/rpwwhome.htm suggests that agriculture
is only allowed if it was an existing agriculture operation at the
time that Massachusetts ?MGL Chapter 131, Section 40: Wetlands
Protection Act? went into effect.
I have also researched the following ideas:
(1) Alternative septic systems as an approach to allow building on
this property. My initial research ? while not conclusive - shows
that this would require a long, costly, and uncertain attempt to
convince our local Board of Health and Wetlands Commission.
(2) Leasing the land to a cellular phone tower company. A neighbor
has already researched this, and met significant neighborhood
opposition.
(3) Donating the land to a conservation body (e.g., the Audubon
Society). While this is appealing, it appears that the tax benefit I
would receive would be much less than even the minimal offer I
received from our neighbor.
(4) Selling the land on the open market. I have been unable to find a
Realtor who is very interested in selling the property since it is
potentially not buildable.
I would appreciate it if you would take another stab at this, perhaps
widening the net to find stories of other people who have been in
similar situations.
|
Clarification of Answer by
easterangel-ga
on
24 Jun 2005 09:25 PDT
Thank you joshablett-ga for coming back quickly!
While not limiting the possibilities of the question is commendable,
Google Answers Researchers usually prefer that customers indicate what
they already have found or knew about the question they are asking.
The reasons for these are the following:
1. Researchers do not have to repeat the efforts of the customer so as
to save lots of time and money on everybody's part.
2. Researchers usually before posting an answer surveys the field if
he or she has thoroughly answered the question. Researchers are
usually be very wary of submitting an answer if it merely repeats what
the customer knows or if the findings do not provide a significant
contribution to the customer's knowledge.
I apologize for already repeating some of the things you alreayd knwo
but I hope you understand that by limiting the scope of the question,
there was no way for me to understand that my efforts will merely
repeat some of your findings.
----------------
Anyway, I tried finding some more possible usage but could only come
up with these things:
1. Billboard Advertising
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_(advertising)
2. Water Towers
http://people.howstuffworks.com/water.htm/printable
3. Wetland Restoration - You can also try to restore the wetland so
that you can accomplish the things mentioned above. Massachusetts has
a wetland restoration program.
Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management
Wetlands Restoration Program
251 Causeway Street, Suite 800
Boston, MA 02114-2136
Fax: 617-626-1240
Email: wetlands.restoration@state.ma.us
Contact Page: http://www.mass.gov/czm/wrp/about_us_pages/contact_us.htm
I hope that this would be of help to you.
Thanks again!
Easterangel-ga
|
Request for Answer Clarification by
joshablett-ga
on
24 Jun 2005 11:19 PDT
Boy, that was a stupid (and expensive) mistake on my part, and I
definitely appreciate the time you've spent thus far. I should have
read the FAQ before posting, as this is addressed in there.
Based on the research you've done thus far, do you think that spending
additional time would be fruitful in finding other ideas? I'm happy
to tip and/or resubmit the question if you believe that that there
additional ideas out there that simply require more time to find.
Many thanks.
|
Clarification of Answer by
easterangel-ga
on
24 Jun 2005 11:35 PDT
Hi again joshablett-ga!
No I don't think it was a stupid mistake. You had a strategy and it
just kinda became quite difficult under the circumstances. Life can be
just like that sometimes so stop blaming yourself.
Were my additional ideas ain't any good?
As with any research on the web, one cannot be certain that he or she
has exhausted every possibility due to the vastness of the web and of
human knowledge. Resubmitting another question and citing the findings
I had on this one including things you already found, will be of help
to the next researcher. You just have to pay for the $0.50 listing
fee.
Again I apologize if my suggestions weren't that helpful at this
point. But I hope you will be able to find situations wherein such
ideas will become valuable.
Sincerely,
Easterangel-ga
|