|
|
Subject:
ratio of higher wages and lower housing costs
Category: Miscellaneous Asked by: 1busydad-ga List Price: $3.00 |
Posted:
25 Jun 2005 20:11 PDT
Expires: 25 Jul 2005 20:11 PDT Question ID: 537039 |
I'm looking for a recent report or web site that would show the top cities for high average income but low cost of housing (rent). I'm guessing that there's an official ratio formula out there somewhere. I'm just looking for areas that would pay well and have cheap housing. Top 100 areas, maybe? Thanks for your help. |
|
Subject:
Re: ratio of higher wages and lower housing costs
Answered By: czh-ga on 26 Jun 2005 22:01 PDT Rated: |
Hello 1busydad-ga, I'm glad you found the articles helpful. The US Census has an incredible wealth of information available but sometimes it's hard to find exactly what you're looking for or to "massage" the information into the format you want. http://www.census.gov/ US Census Bureau Here is my comment as the answer as you noted in your comment. Thanks very much. ~ czh ~ Here are a couple of reports that will take you to some 2000 US Census reports that might help answer your question. http://www.boston.com/census/longform/mass/housing/housing.htm Debunking housing myth Relative costs here moderate, not high, compared to other cities, Census finds First-time home buyers suffering sticker shock might be skeptical, but new Census 2000 data released this week call into question the widely held assumption that Massachusetts residents have to dig deeper to pay for housing than people in other parts of the country. -By Scott Bernard Nelson and Bill Dedman, Boston Globe, 06/06/02 The following information about housing in Massachusetts, New England and the United States comes from the Census. Rankings done by the Boston Globe: ***** There are seven different reports comparing housing and income. Some of these might meet your needs. http://www.curp.neu.edu/sitearchive/column.asp?id=1853 Housing Crisis?: The Devil's in the Details By Maggie Adams and Barry Bluestone Many who read the Boston Globe recently were surprised to learn that Greater Boston's much-touted housing crisis is apparently a "myth." A Globe analysis of newly released 2000 Census data reveals that, relative to household income, housing costs rose only modestly in and around Boston during the 1990s compared with other cities and metro regions. Greater Boston ranked just 84th out of 377 metropolitan areas in terms of the proportion of households spending at least 35 percent of their gross income on homeownership. Boston itself ranked just 41st out of 100 cities when it comes to renters paying at least 35 percent of their income for housing. After two years of studies and news stories detailing skyrocketing local housing prices and rents, the new data seem to suggest that all the concern about a housing crisis may have been overblown. ***** This is an article that interprets the above reports. |
1busydad-ga rated this answer: |
|
Subject:
Re: ratio of higher wages and lower housing costs
From: czh-ga on 26 Jun 2005 01:39 PDT |
Here are a couple of reports that will take you to some 2000 US Census reports that might help answer your question. http://www.boston.com/census/longform/mass/housing/housing.htm Debunking housing myth Relative costs here moderate, not high, compared to other cities, Census finds First-time home buyers suffering sticker shock might be skeptical, but new Census 2000 data released this week call into question the widely held assumption that Massachusetts residents have to dig deeper to pay for housing than people in other parts of the country. -By Scott Bernard Nelson and Bill Dedman, Boston Globe, 06/06/02 The following information about housing in Massachusetts, New England and the United States comes from the Census. Rankings done by the Boston Globe: ***** There are seven different reports comparing housing and income. Some of these might meet your needs. http://www.curp.neu.edu/sitearchive/column.asp?id=1853 Housing Crisis?: The Devil's in the Details By Maggie Adams and Barry Bluestone Many who read the Boston Globe recently were surprised to learn that Greater Boston's much-touted housing crisis is apparently a "myth." A Globe analysis of newly released 2000 Census data reveals that, relative to household income, housing costs rose only modestly in and around Boston during the 1990s compared with other cities and metro regions. Greater Boston ranked just 84th out of 377 metropolitan areas in terms of the proportion of households spending at least 35 percent of their gross income on homeownership. Boston itself ranked just 41st out of 100 cities when it comes to renters paying at least 35 percent of their income for housing. After two years of studies and news stories detailing skyrocketing local housing prices and rents, the new data seem to suggest that all the concern about a housing crisis may have been overblown. ***** This is an article that interprets the above reports. |
Subject:
Re: ratio of higher wages and lower housing costs
From: 1busydad-ga on 26 Jun 2005 21:32 PDT |
Good enough czh-ga. Thanks for your help. If you resubmit as an answer I'll submit payment. Thanks again. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |