![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Risks of paresthesia in dental athesethics
Category: Health > Medicine Asked by: rickies-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
06 Jul 2005 18:32 PDT
Expires: 05 Aug 2005 18:32 PDT Question ID: 540743 |
With regard to mandibular injection nerve blocks (dental), is the risk of paresthesia greater for Articaine than for lidocaine? Articaine is manufactured by the French company Septodont. It was approved for use in the United States in 2000. The FDA approved Articaine with a paresthesia rate of 1%. Lidocaine has been considered the gold standard for dental anesthesia for many years. Haas (Canada) has indicated in a retropective report that Articaine has much higher rates of paresthesia than lidocaine. James Dower (US) has also written in support of these findings. Septodont dismisses these findings as anecdotal. |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
There are no comments at this time. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |