Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Risks of paresthesia in dental athesethics ( No Answer,   0 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Risks of paresthesia in dental athesethics
Category: Health > Medicine
Asked by: rickies-ga
List Price: $10.00
Posted: 06 Jul 2005 18:32 PDT
Expires: 05 Aug 2005 18:32 PDT
Question ID: 540743
With regard to mandibular injection nerve blocks (dental), is the risk
of paresthesia
greater for Articaine than for lidocaine?  Articaine is manufactured
by the French company Septodont.  It was approved for use in the
United States in 2000.  The FDA approved Articaine with a paresthesia
rate of 1%.  Lidocaine has been considered the gold standard for
dental anesthesia for many years.  Haas (Canada) has indicated in a
retropective report that Articaine has much higher rates of
paresthesia than lidocaine.  James Dower (US) has also written in
support of these findings.  Septodont dismisses these findings as
anecdotal.
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy