Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Federal funding for seized property (eminate domain)given to private developers ( Answered,   0 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Federal funding for seized property (eminate domain)given to private developers
Category: Reference, Education and News > Current Events
Asked by: tybop-ga
List Price: $25.00
Posted: 07 Jul 2005 08:22 PDT
Expires: 06 Aug 2005 08:22 PDT
Question ID: 540905
Article in (Fri.) July 1st Wall st. Journal.(front page)"Reacting fast
to the Supreme Court,s eminate domain decisionlast week,the House
voted 231-189 to bar use of federal funding for improvments to land
seized for private development" Who by name and party where those 189
individuals;that voted for theat bill to be passed ??
Answer  
Subject: Re: Federal funding for seized property (eminate domain)given to private developers
Answered By: czh-ga on 07 Jul 2005 09:12 PDT
 
Hello tybop-ga,

Here is the record of the roll call vote in the House of
Representatives on June 30. The website has the complete list of
names. I'm also including a link to the Washington Post article
covering the vote.

All the best.

~ czh ~

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll350.xml
FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 350
(Republicans in roman; Democrats in italic; Independents underlined)

H R 3058      RECORDED VOTE      30-Jun-2005      2:38 PM
AUTHOR(S):  Garrett of New Jersey Amendment
QUESTION:  On Agreeing to the Amendment

***** See web site for the list of names in the roll call.


----------------------------

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/30/AR2005063001082.html
House Votes To Undercut High Court On Property
Federal Funds Tied To Eminent Domain

By Mike Allen and Charles Babington
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, July 1, 2005; Page A01

The House voted yesterday to use the spending power of Congress to
undermine a Supreme Court ruling allowing local governments to force
the sale of private property for economic development purposes. Key
members of the House and Senate vowed to take even broader steps soon.

Last week's 5 to 4 decision has drawn a swift and visceral backlash
from an unusual coalition of conservatives concerned about property
rights and liberals worried about the effect on poor people, whose
property is often vulnerable to condemnation because it does not
generate a lot of revenue.

The House measure, which passed 231 to 189, would deny federal funds
to any city or state project that used eminent domain to force people
to sell their property to make way for a profit-making project such as
a hotel or mall. Historically, eminent domain has been used mainly for
public purposes such as highways or airports.
Comments  
There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy