|
|
Subject:
Belgian beer, 19th century
Category: Family and Home > Food and Cooking Asked by: archae0pteryx-ga List Price: $4.08 |
Posted:
01 Aug 2005 23:14 PDT
Expires: 31 Aug 2005 23:14 PDT Question ID: 550685 |
I'd like the name of a popular brand of Belgian beer that was around in 1887. It doesn't have to still exist as long as it was well known then. And I'd like to know if it would normally have been served cold. Thank you, Archae0pteryx |
|
Subject:
Re: Belgian beer, 19th century
Answered By: landog-ga on 02 Aug 2005 00:43 PDT Rated: |
Hi, Thanks for your query. I can suggest the following: "De Koninck" a full bodied top fermenting ale made by De Koninck Brewery. Established in 1833 De Koninck is the only brewery in the famous city of Antwerp, it is the name of the brewery and also the name of its main product. http://www.dekoninck.be/en/index.htm "Stavelot" a high fermentation beer made by Duvel Moortgat farm brewery - better known today for their famous "Duvel" beer. This beer was around shortly after 1871. http://www.duvel.be/pages/Main.aspx?culture=en&pageid=brouwerij/historiek "Chimay" a Trappist beer. Since 1862 the Cistercian Trappist monks of Chimay have been developing the production of Trappist beers. http://www.chimay.com/ Belgium's Trappist and Lambic beers were served unchilled prior to the 20th century. For one, refridgerators or ice were not available at the local taverns or homes, secondly because beers stored and then served at natural cellar temperatures were naturally....cool! Much more information on belgian beers can be found here: http://www.visitbelgium.com/beer.htm Nice tasting articles & Belgian beer experiences from The BeerHunter, Michael Jackson: http://www.beerhunter.com/documents/19133-000827.html http://www.beerhunter.com/documents/19133-001374.html Your choice of beer may very well depend on the region of Belgium. If you want to get more specific let me know. | |
| |
|
archae0pteryx-ga
rated this answer:
and gave an additional tip of:
$2.06
Thank you for good searching and good finding. |
|
Subject:
Re: Belgian beer, 19th century
From: myoarin-ga on 02 Aug 2005 04:51 PDT |
Hi Tryx, Nothing wrong with Landog's answer. He is right, you want a beer local to the area. On the following site you can click on CITIES and then on the first letter, and then scroll to find your venue and click again for all the breweries ever known there. The problem is that you will find very many that are out of business (a cross, maybe next to a date, at the right. And often the founding date is not given, so one of us would have to try to find that. I would, of course, be happy to try. http://home.tiscali.be/proud2b/ If you are happy with Antwerp, De Koninck is a fine choice. This site can help find other still well known breweries: http://www.xs4all.nl/~patto1ro/belgbrew.htm Bosteels and Artois are names that most people would recognize as Belgian beers, but they might not be local enough. Have to check again on the founding date for some, but the websites usually mention that, Alken-Maes, for example, was founded in 1880 and produces the very well known Kronenbourg 1664 pils (but probably did not back then). You will find that these breweries produce a great range of different labels now, doing things to beer that no purist would condone. ("crappy pils" is a personal opinion of the owner of this site, but for your period, he has a point, pilsener style beer wasn't produced in Belgium back then.) IF I can be of any help, please let me know. Myoarin |
Subject:
Re: Belgian beer, 19th century
From: myoarin-ga on 03 Aug 2005 05:56 PDT |
"Godverdomme!" I can't access tiscali to find the names of the 32 breweries that were in Bruuge before the Great War. But now I know why 95% of the then 3000+ breweries all closed in 1914-15. The Germans took their copper equipment. This is what the website of the only Brugge brewery on the other list says about its history: http://www.proximedia.com/web/degoudenboom.html ?On the exact spot where the Gouden Boom is established today, a certain Jan Hugheins brewed beer as early as in 1455. For generations the place switched between being a brewery and a distillery. Until Jules Vanneste, in 1872, buys the building that housed the distillery 't Hamerken: in 1889 he definitely converts it into a brewery.? From all the disorganized following, I believe the name " 't Hamerken" could be what you are looking for: the name was current at the time, AND it is prominent in the local brewing literature. While the above passage leaves it uncertain as to whether Vanneste brewed in that period, everything below does not question this. Cheers :-) Myoarin http://www.brugsbrouwerijmuseum.be/fPublicaties.html This is a publication about the brewery: ?From ?t Hamerken to De Gouden Boom? Ah, but another site gives this excerpt from the above: http://users.skynet.be/sb176943/AndriesVandenAbeele/AVDA378.htm "Brouwerijgeschiedenis in Brugge De Langestraat was minstens vanaf de late middeleeuwen een straat van brouwerijen, jeneverstokerijen en kroegen. In 1887 werden er niet minder dan 54 drankgelegenheden genoteerd. Over de laatste onder de daar gevestigde brouwerijen is thans een boeiend verhaal gepubliceerd in de reeks Leven in oude huizen, bezorgd door de vzw Levend Archief, die aanleunt bij het Brugse stadsarchief. De vzw voor brouwerijgeschiedenis ?t Hamerken werkte er eveneens aan mee. Het verhaal dat over zes eeuwen loopt, is geconcentreerd op de activiteiten en de bewoners van twee in de Langestraat gesitueerde brouwerijen en slijterijen : ?t Hamerken en het Wit Kruis. Vanaf 1872 huisde aldaar de brouwerij Vanneste, later brouwerij ?t Hamerken." Very roughly with omissions: History of Brewing in Brugge The ?Langestraat? was at least since the late middle ages a street of breweries, ???, and pubs. In 1887 there were noted no less than 54 opportunities for a drink. ????? ??? (Something) is concentrated on the activities ?the residents of two breweries and (?distilleries, often combined): ? ?t Hamerken? and the ?Wit Kruis? (White Cross). After 1872, this was the site of the brewery ?Vanneste?, later the brewery ? ?t Hamerken?. Hmmm? But after that effort, I found these two sites in English, that make the above unnecessary except of that nice line about 1887. Maybe the photos will help in some way: http://www.kilkelly.com/bruges.html The following one is not so specific, but here it is anyway: http://fgeerts.freelinuxhost.com/ddb04/index.htm SO, Prosit again, Myo |
Subject:
Re: Belgian beer, 19th century
From: archae0pteryx-ga on 03 Aug 2005 19:54 PDT |
My thanks once again, Myoarin. Between you and landog, I've got what I need for this one. "Langestraat" is a very nice extra, and I am definitely going to use it. I am starting to wish that I could engage you as my own private researcher. If I could, I would entertain you with one search exercise after another, and you could keep me supplied with sound, well-researched answers to my incessant questions. Tryx |
Subject:
Re: Belgian beer, 19th century
From: myoarin-ga on 04 Aug 2005 07:18 PDT |
Hi Tryx, thanks for the nice words. That was a nice bit of luck with the street. I am collecting peculiar details to be able one day to frame a question asking if anyone can identify the book. :-) About that dress: my Mom (whose parents married about that time) told me a boy should only give a girl something to wear where he could touch her: gloves, scarf .... But if she wears it ... Need to know the size of FR 5 silver coin? About the size of silver dollar. Next one? Best regards, Myoarin |
Subject:
Re: Belgian beer, 19th century
From: archae0pteryx-ga on 04 Aug 2005 21:08 PDT |
Ha ha, Myoarin! Why don't you just ask me to tell you the title when it's published? Stick around and I'll even offer you a pair of complimentary tickets to the movie. Actually there is one rather large detail that would serve as absolute, unequivocal identification (besides my name, of course), but it has never appeared in GA. There'd be no reason for it to. Still, just for fun, someday perhaps I'll work it into a question or comment and leave it there quietly for you to find. Arend's girlfriend isn't going to be so fussy about the niceties your mother remembers, not when she sees the 200 francs. By the way, they'd be paper, wouldn't they? Otherwise there's going to be a hefty pouch. Ever wonder about the fact that (in the movies) when people deliver a sum of money in a leather pouch, they always give the pouch along with it? They never open it, dump out the coins, and put the pouch back in their own pocket. When I pay for something in cash, I just turn over the money, not the wallet, but you never see that in those historical-period movies. I figure that there must have been a flourishing trade in pouch making, and also that the containers of sums of money must have circulated from hand to hand nearly as freely as the money. Thank you for your interest and your help-- Tryx |
Subject:
Re: Belgian beer, 19th century
From: myoarin-ga on 05 Aug 2005 05:34 PDT |
Hi tryx, I am waiting with baited breath ... Coin pouches, lots of thoughts: In films, they can forego showing silver and gold coins; Nobility aschewed handling money (QE2 still does); It still isn't considered polite to make a money gift by just handing over the bills, it being preferred to put them in an envelope (as we do here with the Xmas tips for the mailman and newspaper boy, or for kids' birthdays), and in a travel guide for Russia or Central Asia, it is also recommened not to hand waiters money but to put it on the table; So coin pouches were used in the days when coins had enough value to be a gift; And yes, there were indeed many little coin pouches for this purpose: quite little ones for only a couple of coins (but maybe gold ones) for baptisms or confirmations, etc, etc., fancy ones in silver ("silver" lamé, crocheted or knitted, I believe), and of course in silk or lesser material. Since you asked, and I have found the following information on coinage and bank notes current at the time, I expect that "Arend" would have been given a few gold coins in a pouch: clinking coin, especially gold ones, which he probably never had, being a more impressive award. Do you have to describe the pouch? I'd let it be a new little leather one. The silver coins under the Latin Monetary Union were Fr 0.50, 1, 2, 5; the gold coins were Fr 10, 20, 50, 100 http://digilander.libero.it/maggioref/latin%20monetary%20union.html And at that time there were bank notes in denominations: Fr 20, 50, 100, 1000. http://www.atsnotes.com/catalog/belgium/belgium.html Did Judas get his 30 pieces of silver in a purse? I think in paintings both versions are presented, also with him counting them - which would be a reflection on his character. Regards, Myoarin |
Subject:
Re: Belgian beer, 19th century
From: archae0pteryx-ga on 06 Aug 2005 13:48 PDT |
Hi, Myoarin, Two gold Fr 100 coins would be perfect. How large would they be? No, I don't have to describe the pouch. I would prefer him to look down at the cash in his hand, either crisp or gleaming. With respect to purses, I wasn't thinking so much of gifts. (Yes, many of us even in the gauche U.S. still practice the courtesy of enclosing monetary gifts in an envelope or other holder, and do not give gifts too intimate for the nature of the relationship.) I was thinking of the scene in the movie where, let's say, the two cutthroats have finished off their victim and now appear before the evil nobleman, who tosses them each a purse and a look of revulsion. Or the hero has just galloped through the marketplace, leaving ruined stalls and strewn goods in his wake, and he glances back over his shoulder in chagrin and throws a purse to the nearest merchant. Now he doesn't have bus fare home, let alone enough to compensate the next entrepreneur whose livelihood he destroys, and he doesn't even have anything in which to put the few silver coins he may win in a contest at the next town. But then, I suppose they will come with a purse. I imagine that Judas was given his thirty pieces of silver along with a measure of contempt, in a little handful that fell into the dirt at his feet and that he then had to scramble and pick up. By the way, that would be "bated," I believe, as in "abated," or held, and not having anything to do with worms and fishhooks. At any rate, thank you for your confident anticipation. I am probably two years away from having anything marketable, and even if it sold on the spot, it would probably be another year until press time. So please let your breath out. But you are certainly helping me progress! Tryx |
Subject:
Re: Belgian beer, 19th century
From: myoarin-ga on 06 Aug 2005 16:18 PDT |
Hi tryx, I was afraid of that. I never learned to spell, and I was even thinking: "baited, yeah, like abated." But I'd probably have spelled it wrong, too. :) The beauty of gold and silver coins is/was that they are all about the same size: the dollar about equal 5 Fr in silver, $10 gold eagle about equal Fr 50, etc. This site shows that most one ounce gold coins were/are 32 mm = 1.26 in. in diameter. That would be your Fr 100 piece. A Fr 50 gold coin would have been about 27 mm = ca 1 in. in diameter. If you don't mind my second guessing, I already before had been thinking that four Fr 50 coins would be more appropriate, imagining the donor - a person of "higher standing" admonishing in a friendly tone: "Now don't spend it all at once," using the smaller coins so that Ahrend didn't have to expose his wealth. And now - without a purse - letting the coins clink one after another in his hand, four increasing the duration of the scene. But it's your story. http://www.austincoins.com/gold_specs.htm Yeah, those cutthroats: Kind of "take it or leave it," with the implication by the Sheriff of Nottingham that he either knew he was paying in full - in his own interest (risky business, shortchanging cutthroats) - or trusted that his loyal henchmen could protect him. Two years: and I was thinking this was the last chapter, relieved that they hadn't uncovered the remains of Katja (spelling!) Don't tell me how off track I am. But then there could be additional questions, which is interesting. Why can't your folk speak English like everybody else in Europe? (Rhetorically meant, of course.) Myoarin |
Subject:
Re: Belgian beer, 19th century
From: archae0pteryx-ga on 06 Aug 2005 17:12 PDT |
Myoarin, Nope, nope, nope, you are way off target. Good guessing, though. Maybe you could make a whole other story out of what you think I'm up to, but your apparent notion of my plot line is totally off base. And note, also, that I am not writing scenes in consecutive order as they will appear in the story, so any notion you may have of sequence is probably incorrect. I am not giving my work away online! And there will be tons more questions, so you're not out of work yet. Not ignoring your question about language, but not answering it either. Please don't think me rude, but there's a reason. Four gold Fr 50 pieces will do just as nicely, or even more so, for the reason you say, and thank you for the excellent suggestion. But there's no donor of higher standing--different situation altogether. Tryx |
Subject:
Re: Belgian beer, 19th century
From: myoarin-ga on 07 Aug 2005 07:38 PDT |
Hi Tryx, I'm curiouser and curiouser ... My story would have reincarnation - once as a song bird - but that will entale [sic] bridging a few hundred years and travel to India, perhaps by a Jew to Cochin's then thriving Jewish community, fleeing Spain in the Reconquesta, maybe with his daughter (I'm partial to having girls in the plot), and so on. (He'd obviously speak Ladina, Arabic and Hebrew.) Field for lots of questions. Of course, I don't expect you to reveal anything, just can't help musing. Glad you liked my suggestion. Hope you had a nice Sunday, Myoarin |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |