In searching PubMed for the title you presented, I found three trials,
one of which is in Japanese. The citations follow. I'm not sure what
you mean by "unbiased" published results, though --- depending on your
philosophic stance, one might consider all studies to be biased. If
you just want the raw data (and are mathematically inclined), you
might appeal to the author of a given study. Otherwise you might
check to see if the publishing journal is a well-respected,
peer-reviewed journal, and look at the methodology of the study
itself...
Comparative effect of atypical and conventional antipsychotic drugs on
neurocognition in first-episode psychosis: a randomized, double-blind
trial of olanzapine versus low doses of haloperidol.
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;161(6):985-95.
PMID: 15169686 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
[A clinical study of emergent anxiety in neuroleptic-naive,
first-episode schizophrenia patients following treatment with
risperidone]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2003;105(5):643-58. Japanese.
PMID: 12875232 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Atypical and conventional antipsychotic drugs in treatment-naive
first-episode schizophrenia: a 52-week randomized trial of clozapine
vs chlorpromazine.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003 May;28(5):995-1003. Epub 2003 Mar 26.
PMID: 12700715 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] |