![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
CEOs and NDAs
Category: Business and Money Asked by: leoj-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
11 Aug 2005 23:21 PDT
Expires: 10 Sep 2005 23:21 PDT Question ID: 554804 |
I am interested in getting confirmation in the form of a generally reliable web source of a position I am espousing. It could be multiple sources tied together, but it needs to be clear that my position is in fact correct. I have espoused the understanding that while a NDA (non-disclosure agreement) that employees sign when gaining employment is valid, the CEO of the company could decide what is to be covered by that agreement, essentially allowing him to disclose just about anything publicly. Further, that he can give a limited release to employees to discuss specific matters if he so chooses. For matters that related to a specific person, such as in the case for why an employee was fired, if the person involved gave permission, he could disclose such information. Essentially, for general matters, the position is that a CEO is able to decide what information is and isn't to be covered and thus in effect is not constrained by the employee confidentiality agreement or NDA. You can assume that the CEO in this case has complete control of the board of directors and it is a private, closely held company. I am not referring to NDAs between two companies, since that would clearly be a different case. A tip will be given if the reference material is convincing enough to sway the audience of the discussion. |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: CEOs and NDAs
From: sharpshooter22-ga on 12 Aug 2005 17:10 PDT |
I don't have a website for you, but thought I'd share my thoughts. First, this is simply a matter of contract law. Your position depends on the terms of the NDA. I.e., are the non-disclosure provisions mutual or is only the employee making the promise not to disclose? If it is mutual, then I would contend that the other signatory, the company and therefore the CEO is bound by the terms of the NDA and the employee would be able to enforce the agreement. If, on the other hand, the NDA solely protects the company from unwanted disclosures, then you are right since only the company (in this instance the same as the CEO, provided no fiduciary duties to minority interests are being violated) has an enforceable promise. The company can release an employee, either partially or fully, from his or her contractual obligation under the NDA. But note that the non-mutual NDA must have some, if even nominal, consideration to be enforceable (although this could be, and probably is, the employment opportunity). |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |