|
|
Subject:
Doubt
Category: Relationships and Society > Law Asked by: dprk007-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
13 Aug 2005 13:55 PDT
Expires: 12 Sep 2005 13:55 PDT Question ID: 555399 |
Since the re-introduction of the death penalty by the United States in the 1970's, can you give me 5 examples where there is a strong doubt as to the actual guilt of individuals who have been executed? Many Thanks DPRK007 | |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Subject:
Re: Doubt
Answered By: tutuzdad-ga on 13 Aug 2005 14:11 PDT Rated: |
Dear dprk007-ga: The group TRUTH IN JUSTICE claims that 16 people have been executed in the United States who were innocent. They identify them as Brian K. Baldwin, Cornelius Singleton and Freddie Lee Wright of Alabama; Thomas M. Thompson of California; James Adams, Willie Darden and Jesse Tafero of Florida; Girvies Davis of Illinois; Griffin and Roy Roberts of Missouri; Odell Barnes, Robert N. Drew, Gary Graham, Richard W. Jones and Frank B. McFarland of Texas; and Roger K. Coleman of Virginia. TRUTH IN JUSTICE 'Group says 16 executed in U.S. were probably innocent' http://www.truthinjustice.org/prob-innocent.htm In addition, The 'Reasonable Doubts' report, which was produced by Equal Justice USA, a project of the Hyattsville-based Quixote Center, which is organizing a national effort for a moratorium on executions, makes a strikingly similar claim - that 16 innocent people have been wrongfully executed since the reinstatement of the death penalty. Innocent People Executed, Group Suggests http://www.crimelynx.com/innexec.html Thank you for bringing your question to us. I look forward to next time. tutuzdad-ga * strategy * EXECUTIONS EXECUTED INNOCENT NOT GUILTY | |
|
dprk007-ga rated this answer: and gave an additional tip of: $5.00 |
|
Subject:
Re: Doubt
From: grthumongous-ga on 13 Aug 2005 19:09 PDT |
Other advanced western countries outside the USA have also had to confront and take positive action to correct miscarriages of justice that may or may not involve the death penalty. Without opining on the death penalty itself as a maximum penalty, empirical evidence in Canada and UK shows that a "sound process" is not enough to ensure justice. In 1993, US Supreme Court Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote the majority opinion in a case known as Herrera that said it was not unconstitutional to execute a person as long as the process was deemed fair, even when new evidence of innocence emerges after the conviction. http://www.justicedenied.org/jdhistory.html To be fair to Rehnquist, "not unconstitutional" is NOT EQUAL to "approval". In Canada, through the tireless efforts of James Lockyer and his team, several infamous cases of wrongful convictions have been highlighted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Lockyer Steven Truscott Sentenced in 1959 at the age of 14 to the then mandatory death penalty for capital murder in a child sex slaying. http://www.mapleleafweb.com/education/spotlight/issue_59/background.html David Millgaard Sentenced in 1970 at the age of 16 to life for murder in a knifepoint sex slaying. He spent 23 years in prison and was not paroled because he would not confess and show remorse. He was eventually exonerated by DNA evidence that pointed directly at a known serial rapist --who used knives, and lived in the immediate area. http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/milgaard/ And in the UK too.... Derek Bentley, Guildford Four, Birmingham Six http://www.innocent.org.uk/cases/derekbentley/ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/237296.stm http://www.complete-review.com/reviews/bennettr/doublej.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birmingham_Six |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |