![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Electrostatics
Category: Science Asked by: manuelvitale-ga List Price: $50.00 |
Posted:
24 Aug 2005 21:52 PDT
Expires: 23 Sep 2005 21:52 PDT Question ID: 560116 |
Consider an infinite slab of linear dielectric with thickness 2a containing a uniform free charge density (rho sub 'f'). Find the electric field everywhere and the bound charge densities. *Note a is defined to be a number > 0. Extra Notes: This is a rather simple problem iff there was no thickness to the dielectric. Unfortunately, the thickness forces us to find the field inside the material. Perhaps we must use the Gauss's Law equivalent for the Electric Displacement. I'd be really nice to speak to someone who has a clue about electrostatics. |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Electrostatics
From: racecar-ga on 29 Aug 2005 12:54 PDT |
You are exactly right. In terms of the electric displacement, D, Gauss's Law is div(D) = (rho sub 'f') or, in integral form Int(D dot da) = (Q sub 'f'), where the integral is over a closed surface which contains a total amount (Q sub 'f') of free charge, dot is the dot product, and da is an infinitesimal area element. Let the y axis be perpendicular to the slab, with y=0 at the middle of the slab. Using the integral form of Gauss's law for electric displacement, draw a pillbox with one surface coinciding with the center of the slab and the other surface a distance y above it, still within the slab. There is no flux through the bottom surface (or the sides, obviously) and the flux through the top is just D*A, where A is the area of the top (or bottom) surface of the pillbox. The enclosed free charge is A*y*(rho sub 'f'), so: D = (rho sub 'f')*y. This is valid within the slab. For a linear dielectric, E = D/(K * epsilon naught), where K is the dielectric constant, and epsilon naught is the permittivity of free space. So the electric field inside the slab is E = (rho sub 'f')*y / (K * epsilon naught) [ -a < y < a ] There is a discontinutity in the electric field across the boundary of the slab because of the surface bound charge. You can find the field outside the slab easily (it does not depend on the dielectric constant). It is E = (rho sub 'f') * a / (epsilon naught) [ abs(y) > a ] |
Subject:
Re: Electrostatics
From: racecar-ga on 29 Aug 2005 13:07 PDT |
In the last line, of course, the direction of the field is upward (positive) above the slab and downward (negative) below it. Assuming (rho sub 'f') is positive. |
Subject:
Re: Electrostatics
From: manuelvitale-ga on 04 Sep 2005 13:09 PDT |
The expression for the E-field outside of the dielectric, as you have stated, is a function of a. Shouldn't the E-field outside the material be a function of the distance from the dielectric material? And the E-field inside the dielectric be a constant rather than dependent on y? |
Subject:
Re: Electrostatics
From: racecar-ga on 09 Sep 2005 14:15 PDT |
No, the electric field produced by an infinite sheet of charge is independent of distance from the sheet. See here, for example: www.physlink.com/education/AskExperts/ae544.cfm So, again, the E-field outside the dielectric material is constant, independent of position. If the field inside the dielectric were constant, it would have to be zero everywhere (this is the limit where K goes to infinity). You can see this by symmetry: if the E-field had some nonzero value, how could it decide whether to point up or down? |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |