|
|
Subject:
Golden Handcuffs
Category: Business and Money > Employment Asked by: charltonian-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
30 Aug 2005 07:37 PDT
Expires: 29 Sep 2005 07:37 PDT Question ID: 562178 |
When I took on my current job I was obliged to sign up to a golden handcuffs arrangement (i.e. I have to pay if I leave within a certain amount of time.) In hindsight this was a poor decision, but I needed to to take the job when choices seemed limited, and it's easy to look back and think how you'd do things differently. Moving onwards, when I come to leave, what options do I have to avoid/limit paying out? |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Golden Handcuffs
From: research_help-ga on 30 Aug 2005 09:01 PDT |
I'm wondering what you are looking for in an answer. You have signed what you consider to be a legally binding contract and you are asking how to avoid your obligations in this contract. I don't understand when people sign contracts and then think the terms are optional. |
Subject:
Re: Golden Handcuffs
From: philnj-ga on 30 Aug 2005 09:36 PDT |
You signed the agreement. You have to live with the agreement. I assume that you received some sort of benefit when you took the job (relocation, education, bonus, equipment). The company wants a minimum amount of work out of you in consideration for that benefit. If you don't want to do the work, then they want their money back. If you, for some reason, did not receive the full value of the benefit, you can negotiate with your employer different terms to the signed agreement. Maybe the dissatisfaction is mutual. I imagine that even if they fire you the terms of the agreement require you to still pay. |
Subject:
Re: Golden Handcuffs
From: charltonian-ga on 30 Aug 2005 11:02 PDT |
research_help-ga/philnj-ga Yes, i agree with you both, i did sign the contract, and by doing so I am obliged to pay up on leaving. But, what I should have made more clear is the position was oversold to me, leading me to believe that the work I would be doing was of a higher standard than it has turned out to be (although in fairness I have to say that this is my opinion, I imagine that if argued my employer would deny this.) The more unfortunate side of this is: after the annual review, my pay-rise was disapointing. This means, that I am tied into a lower than average paid position (for the type of work) with a fairly predictable salary increase for the foreseeable future. This is coupled with the problem that I feel that the work I am doing is not improving my long term career opportunities. But if I leave (which I may want to do for increased salary and/or better work) I will be penalised quite stiffly. Whilst I take my contractual obligations quite seriously, it feels to me that I am in a position of little comeback. Maybe this time I have to bite the bullet and put it down to experience. |
Subject:
Re: Golden Handcuffs
From: philnj-ga on 30 Aug 2005 13:29 PDT |
Is the value of a better salary at another job worth more than the penalty you would have to pay when you leave? I'm curious. Do these "Golden handcuffs" expire at some point? Are they expecting some number of years work from you? Can you confirm that you received some sort of benefit when you took the job? Or did you sign some sort of employment contract that covers a certain period? I'd compare the benefits and costs of staying with the costs and benefits of leaving. You might want to factor in non-monetary issues as well. I know you have already said that what you are doing does not advance your career, but are there other benefits at your current job other than salary? Except for the cost of the penalty for leaving your job, are there negative factors assoicated with getting another job? (longer commute, etc). Hopefully, it will work out that in the long run, you will make out better if you leave your job. From you usage, it appears you someplace other |
Subject:
Re: Golden Handcuffs
From: khephri-ga on 30 Aug 2005 14:25 PDT |
While honoring one?s commitments is clearly important, there are also times when one signs a contract with onerous terms, simply because there are mouths to feed, or one is inexperienced with contracts, or one?s personal legal department is a little overmatched by the corporation?s 20 full-time attorneys. Corporations have a tremendous advantage over an individual - the playing field is supposed to be level, but it just plain isn?t. I pray that those who wish to smite the questioner with righteous wrath never find themselves in this difficult dilemma. But, in terms of the question, any meaningful answer will need to come from someone with expertise in contacts and the laws that apply in your locale. Certain contract features are enforceable, others are not (one cannot give away certain rights, even if the contract so specifies, e.g., one cannot sell oneself into slavery). If the contract is fully enforceable in your location, then you can choose to wait out the contract, or negotiate with your employer. It may be that with thoughtful review of your employer?s and your needs, you can find a mutually satisfying way through this problem. One possible solution is separation, but even if you stay, there may some way to change what you do to simultaneously provide your employer with greater value, while at the same time increasing your job satisfaction by allowing you to perform work at a level consistent with your desire to do work of which you can be proud. |
Subject:
Re: Golden Handcuffs
From: jaseaux-ga on 30 Aug 2005 22:00 PDT |
I wonder how hard it would be to fake your death? So do they take the money out of your last paycheck? If not, what if you refuse to pay? |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |