Clarification of Question by
austinmi-ga
on
01 Sep 2005 22:31 PDT
Thanks for the responses. I'm not interested in the mud they use to
rub down the balls with, but instead with the manufacturing process.
I know Rawlings uses a special process to make the leather white at
Tennessee Tanning using alum, but I've seen the leather that comes
from the tannery, and it has a smooth, mat finish, not slick like the
outside of MLB balls. You may be right that the sewing process makes
the leather glossy, since they do tamper with the humidity, first
moistening the balls to sew them, then drying them afterwards. But
from touching the leather on a baseball, it feels like it has
something else coating it. I could be wrong, or maybe Rawlings is
trying to protect this information? In the late 90s with the homerun
explosion, there were allegations that the ball was slicker than
before, but I never saw anything about what caused this finish. This
article talks about the slicker balls:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/outdoors/outdoors/1277546.html?page=1&c=y