![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Physics
Category: Science Asked by: jeremiah1977-ga List Price: $2.00 |
Posted:
02 Sep 2005 14:43 PDT
Expires: 02 Oct 2005 14:43 PDT Question ID: 563676 |
How big is big, and if big is truley big then how big is Enormous? |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Physics
From: pinkfreud-ga on 02 Sep 2005 14:51 PDT |
"Big" is more or less a milli-tad heftier than "large." "Enormous" is approximately a zillion times huger than "big." That's about the size of it. |
Subject:
Re: Physics
From: stephanbird-ga on 03 Sep 2005 02:21 PDT |
"Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space." With apologies to any DNA fans that I may have misremembered the quote. S |
Subject:
Re: Physics
From: corwin_02-ga on 05 Sep 2005 03:31 PDT |
it is all in the perspective of the viewer , for an amoeba a petri dish is the size of a universe where as for an elephant this would be a little thing , hence big is that what in your perspective resembles something out of the ordinary size wise. |
Subject:
Re: Physics
From: sathpra-ga on 05 Sep 2005 23:18 PDT |
In physics We use < or >. There is no >>>> or <<<. Dont thing in a crazy way and don't ask stupid questions. This area is for physics. Not for fun |
Subject:
Re: Physics
From: bozo99-ga on 06 Sep 2005 15:33 PDT |
I disagree with sathpra-ga on the <<<< >>>> comment. Physicists often dismiss as negligible anything beyond a certain point in a taylor series. More seriously they might regard anything above a few atoms as big. Anyway I propose people who regard physics as non-fun should have their electricity terminated - hasta la event horizon baby ! |
Subject:
Re: Physics
From: jeremiah1977-ga on 06 Sep 2005 19:36 PDT |
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." As i Contemplate BIG i think i have made an easy answer for myself. I believe there are 15,747,724,136,275,002,577,605,653,961,181,555,468,044,717,914,527,116,709,366, 231,425,076,185,631,031,296 protons in the universe and the same number of electrons". (=2**256 x 136) Now thats pretty big. Im still working on Enormous> |
Subject:
Re: Physics
From: jeremiah1977-ga on 07 Sep 2005 09:37 PDT |
I would have to say the Taylor Series shows expansion from a point with infinity, is this truely big or enormous? Edwin Hubbell in the 1920's discovered that the universe was expanding. He did so by observing that masses were all expanding away from each other. As the universe expands entropy also increases as entropy is dependent upon volume. S = k ln(W). Einstein found that the probability of volume at a given time was equal to the equilibrium value of the volume times e^(change of entropy divided by the Boltzmann constant). If the change of entropy was 0 then the volume of the universe has reached its equilibrium value. As long as entropy increases the volume of the universe increases (4/3pi r^3). As this was the case (see, Subtle is the Lord, Pais, at pages 74 to 75) it is odd that Einstein would arbitrarily insert the famous cosmological constant in his theory of general relativity to establish a static universe as he himself found a volume dependency to entropy increases. The insertion of the constant violated the second law of thermodynamics which shows ever increasing entropy. The radius of the universe defined and caused by entropy must change with time, at the present increasing. Space in essence must be defined by its energy and the change of energy over time is its entropy. |
Subject:
Re: Physics
From: tghk-ga on 08 Sep 2005 19:46 PDT |
xcxzcxzc |
Subject:
Re: Physics
From: tghk-ga on 08 Sep 2005 19:49 PDT |
It dependce on your definition of big. For a human being the Earth is big and the whole world is enormous. But for say an ant your appartment is big and the building you are residing in is enormouse. |
Subject:
Re: Physics
From: spacesick-ga on 09 Sep 2005 15:24 PDT |
big bigger biggest enormous 123 123456 1234567 12345678 ...Big is 3 long, bigger is 6 long and biggest is 7 long. This would imply that enormous is bigger than biggest, which is obviously impossible. "The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." -Albert Einstein |
Subject:
Re: Physics
From: jeepien-ga on 16 Sep 2005 20:36 PDT |
There is a well-defined meaning for "much larger than" (>>) and "much less than" (<<) . a >> b if (using the standard rules for significant figures), a + b = a. a << b if (using the standard rules for significant figures), a + b = b. Some computer languages implement this definition for special comparison operators. |
Subject:
Re: Physics
From: zerosystem-ga on 19 Sep 2005 19:26 PDT |
Big is a subjective mesure, it is only used (in science) for comparaison purpuses, like this cell is bigger than this cell or to categorise for example: classifie big fis and small fish in a pond. Big is different for each peson that uses it and has different sizes depending on the field: a 100 micron bacteria is big but a 150cm person is not big you have to look at the "big" picture lol |
Subject:
Re: Physics
From: ravikorlipara-ga on 22 Sep 2005 17:18 PDT |
BIG is as big as your heart and ENORMOUS is as big as your appetite for knowledge. |
Subject:
Re: Physics
From: anurag_jain-ga on 29 Sep 2005 02:25 PDT |
Please refer to this article written more than a year ago. http://spinynebula.blogspot.com/2004/07/perspectives.html |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |