Google Answers Logo
View Question
Q: WACC of a NYSE company ( Answered 5 out of 5 stars,   0 Comments )
Subject: WACC of a NYSE company
Category: Business and Money > Finance
Asked by: erotyquewhyspers-ga
List Price: $15.00
Posted: 08 Sep 2005 23:31 PDT
Expires: 08 Oct 2005 23:31 PDT
Question ID: 565963
I have been trying to figure this out but there are more than ONE
formula for WACC.  I'm simply trying to find the WACC of GOOGLE. 
However, I really need for it to be explained.  How do I find the
corporate rate, cost of equity and cost of debt?

2,693,465 = Total Assets
340,368 = Total Debt
I believe the Corporate tax rate is 59% but I don't know how I got that answer.

If anyone can help, I'll appreciate it.
Subject: Re: WACC of a NYSE company
Answered By: omnivorous-ga on 10 Sep 2005 06:24 PDT
Rated:5 out of 5 stars
Erotyquewhyspers --

I?ll use the Q2 quarterly report for Google, which is listed on the
NASDAQ as GOOG because the company only went public last year and it
dramatically changed the balance sheet.  You can find the income
statement and balance sheet here:

Securities & Exchange Commission
Google Second Quarter 2005 (Quarter ended June 30, 2005)


The full weighted-average cost-of-capital (WACC) for a firm is given by:

WACC = Rc (E/VL) + rD(1-t)(D/VL)

Rc: return on equity
E/VL: proportion of equity in total firm value
rD: debt or bond percentages
t: tax rate (expressed as a decimal; 40% = 0.40)
D/VL: proportion of debt in total firm value
?Weighted-average cost-of-capital? (undated)


Total shareholders? equity (E) is $3,953,857,000 (from the Balance
Sheet).  The current portion of equipment leases are $291,000 ? and
there is no other debt on the balance sheet.  (In fact, the company
earned $33.4 million on its cash balances.)  The debt is so small
(D/VL is less than .0001) that it?s impact on these calculations will
be zero.

The tax rate, by the way, is calculated by using tax provision/net income:

For the six months:
Tax rate = $239,869,000 / $951,876,000 = 25.2%

In finance issues, tax rates are often below the U.S. corporate
maximum of 35% due to previous losses or investment tax credits. 
Sometimes they?ll be slightly higher due to state taxes.


This is actually the most-difficult portion of the calculation, as
Google is a fast-growing company, with REVENUES growing by 95% in the
first six months of 2005 (compared to 2004) and income going up almost
400%.  However, the most-conservative calculation of Rc would
annualize the $712 million in net income ? putting it at $1,424

Rc = annual net income / total equity = $1,424 million / $3,954 million = 36.01% 

Because this is an all-equity firm (D/VL is effectively zero), that?s
you?re weighted-average cost of capital.


1.	Google?s net income is growing so fast that Rc will undoubtedly be
higher due to annual net income being higher than $1.424 billion.
2.	There are alternate ways to calculate Rc using the capital-asset
pricing model, but this requires an estimate of stock-market returns,
Google?s beta and Treasury bill rates.  These are commonly used in
finance but seem to be outside the scope of your question.  However,
if you?re interested in researching this further, again Investopedia
has an excellent summary:

CAPM (undated)

Google search strategy:
Weighted-average cost-of-capital
Capital-asset pricing model

Your data used in the question appears out-of-date, so it may be
contributing to confusion about Google's capitalization and WACC.  If
there is any confusion, please let me know via a clarification request
before rating this Answer.

Best regards,


Request for Answer Clarification by erotyquewhyspers-ga on 10 Sep 2005 07:44 PDT
Omnivorous, Thank you for breaking it down as you did.

You stated that I was using older data in my initial question, how can
I be sure I'm suring the correct information.  I thought I pulled up
the latest balance sheets & income statements.

I worked on a similar problem for 3 days.  Now, I concerned that I
didn't use the most current, information.

Request for Answer Clarification by erotyquewhyspers-ga on 10 Sep 2005 07:48 PDT
Also, is one formula of WACC better than another?

When I goggled it, I found at least two and in the books purchased
from Barnes and Nobles - I found at least one more.  However, I did
opt for the one on

Clarification of Answer by omnivorous-ga on 10 Sep 2005 07:51 PDT
Erotyquewhyspers --

Probably the best way to assure that you have the most-current data is
to use the Investor Relations (IR) pages for any company.  Here's
Google's IR page and it has a link to the Q2 earnings statement:

A good alternate is the SEC Edgar database, which is where I picked up
the Q2 earnings release.  Note that it will sometimes be a day or two
behind corporate IR pages:

Best regards,


Clarification of Answer by omnivorous-ga on 10 Sep 2005 08:13 PDT
To answer your question: "Also, is one formula of WACC better than
another?"  It really depends on what's being evaluated:

*  are you an investor looking to see what the returns on purchasing
stock are likely to be?
*  are you a Google finance person (or Google manager) trying to make
a decision whether or not to invest in a project?
*  are you a Google finance manager or executive trying to evaluate
optimal strategy?
*  are you a stock market analyst trying to estimate future value of the firm?

As an example, companies involved in leasing businesses -- where
there's a steady, predictable cash flow -- can use debt to reduce
their cost-of-capital.  So, depending on the investment decision (and
competitive situation) Google's financial officer might choose to
raise money for a project using bonds.

As for different formulas -- you often find a variety of ways of
estimating the cost-of-capital because a company isn't public.  For
public companies, modern financial theory says "use the capital-asset
pricing model" because it's based on the stock market, which is
efficient in its pricing.  However, even here there are problems --
most notably a prediction of what future market returns are going to

I'd recently answered this question on WACC and you may be interested
in the assumptions behind using it (it's even longer than the
disclaimer section to your answer!) --

Google Answers
"Calculating Weighted Average Cost Of Capital," (Omnivorous-GA, Aug. 12, 2005)

Best regards,

erotyquewhyspers-ga rated this answer:5 out of 5 stars and gave an additional tip of: $10.00
You are right, I did have the most difficulty when calculating the
return on equity.  I completed the WACC with another company.  I can
now go back and see where I went wrong in my configurations.

You mentioned Beta & US beta and Treasury bill rates, for the company
I completed WACC on; I had to find those rates.  I found the beta at as well, I googled US Treasure Bill.

*whew*  Your mentioning them in the disclaimer makes me more confident.

This was my first time using this service and I'm very impressed.  I
will be back if I ever need more clarification on something.

omnivorous - Thanks again.

There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  

Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy