Request for Question Clarification by
hedgie-ga
on
26 Sep 2005 08:53 PDT
Dear girl...-ga
It is not "public sector vs private sector" . All National Labs are
- well- national labs. Who is managing them (University of CA for
LANL and LLNL), AT&T for Sandia,.. is mostly of historical
significance.
They are all 'really' managed directly by DOE today:
http://www.doe.gov/engine/content.do?BT_CODE=SCIENCE
DOE loves to make multi-lab projects, where corresponding teams
from different labs cooperate/compete, each contributing their
'core competencies. It changed (for worse) when some labs were put
under Homeland Security dept.
Traditionally, Sandia was more computationally oriented (AT&T 'invented' unix)
LLNL and LANL were more physics - but that is historical too.
LANL was considered a 'better' place to work for (for a scientist) than most,
but recent scandals, (Ho Lee, the 'problems' with the security of data ) --
which all may have been just politics, both office and national --
tarnished their reputation.
Labs tell you quite a bit about what they do:
http://www.lanl.gov/orgs/t/t3/geosciences.shtml
LANL has the most colorful history
http://www.lanl.gov/history/wartime/staff_d-g.shtml
but all labs have similar relationship to geology:
It started with study of seismic waves to detect nuclear explosions
(in order to monitor what other nations do and for treaty verifications)
and branched into environmental studies
(remediation of ground water contamination) etc..
Labs sites tell you rather a lot about this subject:
Just type "geolog" into the search box on the sites
http://www.sandia.gov/
http://www.lanl.gov/
Top right, to get glimpse of activities
http://multimedia.sandia.gov/k2search/servlet/K2Search
[
http://www-robot.lanl.k12.nm.us/search?q=geology&btnG=Search&site=outside_lanl&client=outside_lanl&proxystylesheet=outside_lanl&output=xml_no_dtd
]
Job titles are not really important,
except perhaps for HR dept,
and you can get them typing 'jobs' in those search engines:
GROUP LEADER
TEAM LEADER
STAFF MEMBER - OTHER ..
http://www.hr.lanl.gov/JPS/jobsdb.asp?JobType=UC&Order=Organization
There are some good books about the labs,
which can give you feel for the atmosphere, ambiance:
http://www.namebase.org/sources/YT.html
http://www.sonic.net/~kerry/bohemian/grovenukes.html
http://www.abo.fi/~mlindroo/GreatExp/columbus.html
In summary, a good scientist would look for a good team
doing interesting, reputable work. The leaders are key,
of course, but so are co-researchers.
S/he would know people from other labs by reputation, publications
and often personally. The prestige of the lab itself is secondary.
Hedgie