![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
English grammar
Category: Reference, Education and News Asked by: lynne1986-ga List Price: $2.00 |
Posted:
22 Sep 2005 09:38 PDT
Expires: 22 Oct 2005 09:38 PDT Question ID: 571018 |
Is it grammatically correct to say "I was sat there watching the game"...as an alternative to "I sat there..." or "I was sitting there..." | |
|
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: English grammar
From: guyfromusa-ga on 22 Sep 2005 10:16 PDT |
I had sat there. (Past Perfect) You can't use "was sat". You can of course say "I am sitting" (Present Continuous) |
Subject:
Re: English grammar
From: stressedmum-ga on 22 Sep 2005 17:01 PDT |
I believe that it is a solecism, and although guyfromusa says you *can't* use "was sat", go to England -- particularly in t'North! -- and you'll find many well-educated people who *do* use it all the time! It would be fascinating to hear from a linquistics expert who could probably trace it back to some conjugation/interpretation of latin or gaelic. For the definition of solecism, go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solecism "... Some examples of usages often regarded as solecisms in standard English are: * "This is just between you and I." for "This is just between you and me." (hypercorrection by people instructed to avoid the common "you and me" form in the subject of sentences; "me" is in fact the correct pronoun for the object of a preposition.) * "He ain't going." for "He's not going." (dialectic usage; see ain't) * "This is me and Leslie's house." for "This is Leslie's and my house." (dialectic usage) * "Whom ate the food?" for "Who ate the food?" (hypercorrection by people who think that whom is simply a formal version of "who")..." |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |