I want to show that a specific piece of land right near water (eg a
river or bay) can be much more expensive than adjacent land to that
specific piece of land near water.
Find out what the square-meter price of land right near the water is,
and land near that land.
Just two examples are enough. Look in the following regions: near the
Thames (England), the Cote D'Azur (France), cape Cod (USA) or de Vecht river
(between Amsterdam and Utrecht, Holland), san francisco bay (USA)
Somehow it should be clear that the difference in price is caused by
the vicinity to the water, and not by an other phenomenon, such as the
house on it (I realize this is hard). |