|
|
Subject:
Argument
Category: Reference, Education and News > Teaching and Research Asked by: freefreeman-ga List Price: $20.00 |
Posted:
27 Sep 2005 06:08 PDT
Expires: 30 Sep 2005 07:13 PDT Question ID: 573218 |
Americans of every stripe are angry at the bumbling response by our federal government to the Katrina devastation. Weeks after Katrina made hundreds of thousands of Americans homeless across several states, Washington seems more concerned with laying blame on the state governments than on providing leadership and solutions. The Republican Party seems more concerned with managing the public relations and media fallout over the lack of government response than in delivering temporary housing solutions to the displaced. It is a disgrace that four years after 9/11, and spending billions of dollars on Homeland Security, the United States is today less able to provide emergency relief to American citizens who are desperately in need. Enough bickering. America needs leadership. Is the argument inductive or deductive? How do you know? What are the premises and conclusions. | |
| |
| |
|
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
There are no comments at this time. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |